258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17667314)
1. Using automated clinical data for risk adjustment: development and validation of six disease-specific mortality predictive models for pay-for-performance.
Tabak YP; Johannes RS; Silber JH
Med Care; 2007 Aug; 45(8):789-805. PubMed ID: 17667314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modifying ICD-9-CM coding of secondary diagnoses to improve risk-adjustment of inpatient mortality rates.
Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Fry DE; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Meimban R; Warner D; Gonzales J
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 18812585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
Zhu H; Hill MD
Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk-adjusting hospital inpatient mortality using automated inpatient, outpatient, and laboratory databases.
Escobar GJ; Greene JD; Scheirer P; Gardner MN; Draper D; Kipnis P
Med Care; 2008 Mar; 46(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18388836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Burden of illness score for elderly persons: risk adjustment incorporating the cumulative impact of diseases, physiologic abnormalities, and functional impairments.
Inouye SK; Bogardus ST; Vitagliano G; Desai MM; Williams CS; Grady JN; Scinto JD
Med Care; 2003 Jan; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 12544545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.
O'Brien SM; Shahian DM; Filardo G; Ferraris VA; Haan CK; Rich JB; Normand SL; DeLong ER; Shewan CM; Dokholyan RS; Peterson ED; Edwards FH; Anderson RP;
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1 Suppl):S23-42. PubMed ID: 19559823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the performance of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk-adjustment index across socioeconomic strata among patients discharged from the hospital after acute myocardial infarction.
Alter DA; Venkatesh V; Chong A;
Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 16442894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Derivation and validation of in-hospital mortality prediction models in ischaemic stroke patients using administrative data.
Lee J; Morishima T; Kunisawa S; Sasaki N; Otsubo T; Ikai H; Imanaka Y
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 35(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 23429000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.
Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Mattera JA; Wang Y; Han LF; Ingber MJ; Roman S; Normand SL
Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):1683-92. PubMed ID: 16549637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships between in-hospital and 30-day standardized hospital mortality: implications for profiling hospitals.
Rosenthal GE; Baker DW; Norris DG; Way LE; Harper DL; Snow RJ
Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar; 34(7):1449-68. PubMed ID: 10737447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining administrative and clinical data to stratify surgical risk.
Fry DE; Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Warner D; Meimban R
Ann Surg; 2007 Nov; 246(5):875-85. PubMed ID: 17968182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of risk-adjustment models using administrative or clinical data for outcome prediction in patients after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in Korea.
Park HK; Yoon SJ; Ahn HS; Ahn LS; Seo HJ; Lee SI; Lee KS
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1086-90. PubMed ID: 17537190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should we add clinical variables to administrative data?: The case of risk-adjusted case fatality rates after admission for acute myocardial infarction.
Johnston TC; Coory MD; Scott I; Duckett S
Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1180-5. PubMed ID: 18007168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with heart failure.
Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Mattera JA; Wang Y; Han LF; Ingber MJ; Roman S; Normand SL
Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):1693-701. PubMed ID: 16549636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality.
Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Fry DE; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Meimban R; Warner D; Gonzales J
JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 17200477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.
Parker JP; Li Z; Damberg CL; Danielsen B; Carlisle DM
Med Care; 2006 Jul; 44(7):687-95. PubMed ID: 16799364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which hospitals have significantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction patients? Improved risk adjustment with present-at-admission diagnoses.
Stukenborg GJ; Wagner DP; Harrell FE; Oliver MN; Heim SW; Price AL; Han CK; Wolf AM; Connors AF
Circulation; 2007 Dec; 116(25):2960-8. PubMed ID: 18071076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
