BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17667409)

  • 1. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline.
    Springer IN; Wannicke B; Warnke PH; Zernial O; Wiltfang J; Russo PA; Terheyden H; Reinhardt A; Wolfart S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Aug; 59(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 17667409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces.
    Zaidel DW; Cohen JA
    Int J Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 115(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 16040358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces.
    Zaidel DW; Aarde SM; Baig K
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 15780460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.
    Baudouin JY; Tiberghien G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 15500809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness.
    Cellerino A
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2003; 26(3 Suppl):45-8. PubMed ID: 12834020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attractiveness of natural faces compared to computer constructed perfectly symmetrical faces.
    Zaidel DW; Deblieck C
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 117(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 17365126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: a 3-dimensional data analysis.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Alpers GW; Gerdes AB; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):168.e1-8; discussion 168-9. PubMed ID: 20152669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ideal of facial beauty: a review.
    Hönn M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 17238049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in perceived attractiveness: differences between dynamic and static faces.
    Rubenstein AJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):759-62. PubMed ID: 16181436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful.
    Swaddle JP; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jul; 261(1360):111-6. PubMed ID: 7644543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial attractiveness biases the perception of eye contact.
    Kloth N; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1906-18. PubMed ID: 21756185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption.
    Halsey LG; Huber JW; Bufton RD; Little AC
    Alcohol; 2010 Jun; 44(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20570085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The two sides of beauty: laterality and the duality of facial attractiveness.
    Franklin RG; Adams RB
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19914760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic diversity revealed in human faces.
    Lie HC; Rhodes G; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2473-86. PubMed ID: 18691260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Colombo A; Tartaglia G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 9511485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?
    Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 19394585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.