These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1766795)

  • 1. Effect of geometric parameters of perspective on judgements of spatial information.
    Barfield W; Kim Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Oct; 73(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 1766795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception.
    Bruggeman H; Yonas A; Konczak J
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1420-6. PubMed ID: 17166526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of geometric field of view on stereoscopic spatial judgments.
    Banton P; Thompson P; Quinlan PT
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 11866196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgments of azimuth and elevation as a function of monoscopic and binocular depth cues using a perspective display.
    Barfield W; Rosenberg C
    Hum Factors; 1995 Mar; 37(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 7790007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial performance with perspective displays as a function of computer graphics eyepoint elevation and geometric field of view.
    Barfield W; Hendrix C; Bjorneseth O
    Appl Ergon; 1995 Oct; 26(5):307-14. PubMed ID: 15677033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual localization within single geometric planes of a space habitat.
    Tafforin C; Campan R; Imbert C
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1997 Mar; 68(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 9056026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do people apprehend large numerosities?
    Sophian C; Chu Y
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):460-78. PubMed ID: 18082157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-dimensional and multi-dimensional studies of the exocentric distance estimates in frontoparallel plane, virtual space, and outdoor open field.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Matsushima EH; Ribeiro-Filho NP; Da Silva JA
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 17120706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view.
    Barfield W; Rosenberg C; Furness TA 3rd
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(3):233-56. PubMed ID: 11541915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM; Abramov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19304613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pictorial perspective: perception of size, linear, and texture perspective in children and adults.
    Hagen MA; Glick R
    Perception; 1977; 6(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 600668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underestimating numerosity of items in visual search tasks.
    Cassenti DN; Kelley TD; Ghirardelli TG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 21162441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual navigation performance: the relationship to field of view and prior video gaming experience.
    Richardson AE; Collaer ML
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Apr; 112(2):477-98. PubMed ID: 21667757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of perspective and slant on perception of apparent size and distance.
    Thompson JG; Valenti CA; Schiffman HR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 724393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The representational space of numerical magnitude: illusions of length.
    de Hevia MD; Girelli L; Bricolo E; Vallar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1496-514. PubMed ID: 17924288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foreshortening produces errors in the perception of angles pictured as on the ground.
    Wnuczko M; Singh K; Kennedy JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):309-16. PubMed ID: 26537919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of shape, size, and chromaticity of stimuli on estimated size in normally sighted, severely myopic, and visually impaired students.
    Huang KC; Wang HF; Chen CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):931-40. PubMed ID: 20681344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shifting visual attention in stereographic displays: a time course analysis.
    Iavecchia HP; Folk CL
    Hum Factors; 1994 Dec; 36(4):606-18. PubMed ID: 7875690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.