These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17668269)

  • 1. Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care.
    Krebs EE; Carey TS; Weinberger M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Oct; 22(10):1453-8. PubMed ID: 17668269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain.
    Cleland JA; Childs JD; Whitman JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jan; 89(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 18164333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring alternative approaches to routine outpatient pain screening.
    Lorenz KA; Krebs EE; Bentley TG; Sherbourne CD; Goebel JR; Zubkoff L; Lanto AB; Asch SM
    Pain Med; 2009 Oct; 10(7):1291-9. PubMed ID: 19818039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders.
    Farrar JT; Pritchett YL; Robinson M; Prakash A; Chappell A
    J Pain; 2010 Feb; 11(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19665938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How reliable is pain as the fifth vital sign?
    Lorenz KA; Sherbourne CD; Shugarman LR; Rubenstein LV; Wen L; Cohen A; Goebel JR; Hagenmeier E; Simon B; Lanto A; Asch SM
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19429735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.
    Hess EP; Perry JJ; Calder LA; Thiruganasambandamoorthy V; Body R; Jaffe A; Wells GA; Stiell IG
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Apr; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 20370775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the surgical Pleth index for assessment of postoperative pain: a pilot study.
    Thee C; Ilies C; Gruenewald M; Kleinschmidt A; Steinfath M; Bein B
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 24827966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for improving efficiency in quality measurement: the example of pain screening.
    Bentley TG; Malin J; Longino S; Asch S; Dy S; Lorenz KA
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2011 Dec; 23(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 21846733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictability of simple clinical tests to identify shoulder pain after stroke.
    Rajaratnam BS; Venketasubramanian N; Kumar PV; Goh JC; Chan YH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 88(8):1016-21. PubMed ID: 17678664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symptom burden and comorbidities impact the consistency of responses on patient-reported functional outcomes.
    Cheville AL; Basford JR; Dos Santos K; Kroenke K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 23988394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale.
    Abbott JH; Schmitt J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Aug; 44(8):560-4. PubMed ID: 24828475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.
    Heneweer H; Aufdemkampe G; van Tulder MW; Kiers H; Stappaerts KH; Vanhees L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 17334295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term variability in outpatient pain intensity scores in a national sample of older veterans with chronic pain.
    Dobscha SK; Morasco BJ; Kovas AE; Peters DM; Hart K; McFarland BH
    Pain Med; 2015 May; 16(5):855-65. PubMed ID: 25545398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
    Kovacs FM; Abraira V; Royuela A; Corcoll J; Alegre L; Cano A; Muriel A; Zamora J; del Real MT; Gestoso M; Mufraggi N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2915-20. PubMed ID: 18246018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study.
    Gavish L; Barzilay Y; Koren C; Stern A; Weinrauch L; Friedman DJ
    Physiotherapy; 2015 Mar; 101(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25280603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symptomatic magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbar disk herniation patients: a comparative effectiveness prospective observational study of 2 age- and sex-matched cohorts treated with either high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy or imaging-guided lumbar nerve root injections.
    Peterson CK; Leemann S; Lechmann M; Pfirrmann CW; Hodler J; Humphreys BK
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 May; 36(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 23706678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of quick and easy undernutrition screening tools--Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, and modified Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool--in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    van Venrooij LM; van Leeuwen PA; Hopmans W; Borgmeijer-Hoelen MM; de Vos R; De Mol BA
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2011 Dec; 111(12):1924-30. PubMed ID: 22117670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
    Young IA; Cleland JA; Michener LA; Brown C
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 89(10):831-9. PubMed ID: 20657263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.