320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17669371)
1. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
Tong Y; Melara RD
Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention.
Melara RD; Chen S; Wang H
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16157478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Event-related potentials elicited by distractors in an auditory oddball paradigm in schizophrenia.
Kogoj A; Pirtosek Z; Tomori M; Vodusek DB
Psychiatry Res; 2005 Nov; 137(1-2):49-59. PubMed ID: 16214220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention.
Melara RD; Rao A; Tong Y
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):279-306. PubMed ID: 11999855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of working memory: effects of attention training on target recognition and distractor salience in an auditory selection task.
Melara RD; Tong Y; Rao A
Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1430():68-77. PubMed ID: 22099165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc.
Mazza V; Turatto M; Caramazza A
Cortex; 2009; 45(7):879-90. PubMed ID: 19084218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences.
Bendixen A; Roeber U; Schröger E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1664-77. PubMed ID: 18271740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal dissociation between distractors and targets: the impact of residual distractor processing on target responses.
Kritikos A; McNeill J; Pavlis A
J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18316295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.
Degerman A; Rinne T; Särkkä AK; Salmi J; Alho K
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(12):3329-41. PubMed ID: 18598270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential grouping of pure-tone percepts evoked by the segregation of components from a complex tone.
Haywood NR; Roberts B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1263-74. PubMed ID: 21517216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
Sawaki R; Katayama J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.
Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):878-91. PubMed ID: 20565207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
