These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17669739)

  • 1. Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands.
    Helmisaari HS; Derome J; Nöjd P; Kukkola M
    Tree Physiol; 2007 Oct; 27(10):1493-504. PubMed ID: 17669739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ectomycorrhizal root tips in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in boreal forests.
    Helmisaari HS; Ostonen I; Lõhmus K; Derome J; Lindroos AJ; Merilä P; Nöjd P
    Tree Physiol; 2009 Mar; 29(3):445-56. PubMed ID: 19203968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fine root morphological adaptations in Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch along a latitudinal gradient in boreal forests.
    Ostonen I; Lõhmus K; Helmisaari HS; Truu J; Meel S
    Tree Physiol; 2007 Nov; 27(11):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17669752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fine root biomass and production in Scots pine stands in relation to stand age.
    Makkonen K; Helmisaari HS
    Tree Physiol; 2001 Feb; 21(2-3):193-8. PubMed ID: 11303650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stand age and fine root biomass, distribution and morphology in a Norway spruce chronosequence in southeast Norway.
    Børja I; De Wit HA; Steffenrem A; Majdi H
    Tree Physiol; 2008 May; 28(5):773-84. PubMed ID: 18316309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of changing climate on the productivity of Norway spruce dominant stands with a mixture of Scots pine and birch in relation to water availability in southern and northern Finland.
    Ge ZM; Kellomäki S; Peltola H; Zhou X; Wang KY; Väisänen H
    Tree Physiol; 2011 Mar; 31(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 21436231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential implications of shortened rotation length for forest birds, bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants: An example from southern Swedish production forests.
    Petersson L; Lariviere D; Holmström E; Lindbladh M; Felton A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0289835. PubMed ID: 38100411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating foliage biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) plots.
    Lehtonen A
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):803-11. PubMed ID: 15870050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in Fine-Root Biomass of Trees and Understory Vegetation among Stand Types in Subtropical Forests.
    Fu X; Wang J; Di Y; Wang H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128894. PubMed ID: 26047358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland.
    Vanninen P; Mäkelä A
    Tree Physiol; 1999 Oct; 19(12):823-830. PubMed ID: 10562399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Root proliferation of Norway spruce and Scots pine in response to local magnesium supply in soil.
    Zhang J; George E
    Tree Physiol; 2009 Feb; 29(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 19203945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carbon budget for Scots pine trees: effects of size, competition and site fertility on growth allocation and production.
    Vanninen P; Mäkelä A
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15519982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The tree species matters: Biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce.
    Felton A; Petersson L; Nilsson O; Witzell J; Cleary M; Felton AM; Björkman C; Sang ÅO; Jonsell M; Holmström E; Nilsson U; Rönnberg J; Kalén C; Lindbladh M
    Ambio; 2020 May; 49(5):1035-1049. PubMed ID: 31552644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ecosystem carbon density and allocation across a chronosequence of longleaf pine forests.
    Samuelson LJ; Stokes TA; Butnor JR; Johnsen KH; Gonzalez-Benecke CA; Martin TA; Cropper WP; Anderson PH; Ramirez MR; Lewis JC
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jan; 27(1):244-259. PubMed ID: 28052499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responses in growth and emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds in Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch seedlings to different warming treatments in a controlled field experiment.
    Pikkarainen L; Nissinen K; Ghimire RP; Kivimäenpää M; Ikonen VP; Kilpeläinen A; Virjamo V; Yu H; Kirsikka-Aho S; Salminen T; Hirvonen J; Vahimaa T; Luoranen J; Peltola H
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 821():153277. PubMed ID: 35074390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland.
    Mäkinen H; Hynynen J; Siitonen J; Sievänen R
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Oct; 16(5):1865-79. PubMed ID: 17069378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimates and relationships between aboveground and belowground resource exchange surface areas in a Sitka spruce managed forest.
    Butler AJ; Barbier N; Cermák J; Koller J; Thornily C; McEvoy C; Nicoll B; Perks MP; Grace J; Meir P
    Tree Physiol; 2010 Jun; 30(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 20404352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in fine root production and longevity in relation to water and nutrient availability in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden.
    Majdi H
    Tree Physiol; 2001 Sep; 21(14):1057-61. PubMed ID: 11560819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Logging residue removal after thinning in boreal forests: long-term impact on the nutrient status of Norway spruce and Scots pine needles.
    Luiro J; Kukkola M; Saarsalmi A; Tamminen P; Helmisaari HS
    Tree Physiol; 2010 Jan; 30(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 19934174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root turnover and root necromass accumulation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) are affected by soil acidity.
    Godbold DL; Fritz HW; Jentschke G; Meesenburg H; Rademacher P
    Tree Physiol; 2003 Sep; 23(13):915-21. PubMed ID: 14532015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.