These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1767056)

  • 1. [Comparison of iopamidol 150 and 370 with the same iodine dosage (37 g) in urography].
    Crespi-Porro R; Conti A; Cabella R
    Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 1767056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Feasibility and optimization of the combined injection of contrast medium and normal saline with a single-syringe CT injection system].
    Raatschen HJ; Albrecht T
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):844-8. PubMed ID: 12811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media.
    Nauert C; Mützel W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital radiography in urography].
    Salvini E; Abbona M; Barigozzi P; Favini G; Pedroli G; Crespi A; Pastori R; Cerutti R; Stacul F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 77(1-2):44-50. PubMed ID: 2928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative evaluation of 2 non-ionic contrast media, iopentol (350 mgI/ml) and iopamidol (370 mgI/ml) in coronary angiography].
    Maddestra N; Di Cesare A; Salute L; Toppetti A; Minguzzi P; Marelli C; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 7997610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of intravenous drip infusion excretory urography using ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
    Onitsuka H; Araki A; Torii Y; Tsukuda M; Murakami J; Ino A; Hashiguchi N; Masuda K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 49(7):915-20. PubMed ID: 2798075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control in urography with iopamidol and iohexol. A parallel comparison].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 3562919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pharmacokinetics of iopamidol 370 in infants and children during ivp.
    Beluffi G; Cerutti R; Fiori P; Martini A
    Radiol Med; 1989 May; 77(5):493-5. PubMed ID: 2748960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative evaluation of iopamidol 300 versus 370 during spiral x-ray computed tomographic studies of the thorax].
    Lucidarme O; Mourey-Gerosa I; Beigelman C; Grenier P
    J Radiol; 1996 May; 77(5):343-9. PubMed ID: 8762932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental study of flow rates in microcatheters using various kinds of contrast materials: comparison of imaging capability by iodine delivery rates].
    Nitatori T; Dohno S; Hanaoka H; Takei R; Hachiya J; Furuya Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1263-9. PubMed ID: 7610029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A double-blind comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Renwick IG; Fowler RC
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Jun; 41(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 2200632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iodixanol in intravenous urography: a comparison of iodixanol 270 mgI/ml, iodixanol 320 mgI/ml and iopamidol 300 mgI/ml (NIOPAM).
    Conroy RM; Bjartveit K; Sheppick A; Long U; Masterson J
    Clin Radiol; 1994 May; 49(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 8013200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS; Thomsen HS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Excretory urography with non-ionic contrast medium; clinical reassessment of the necessity of water deprivation].
    Soga T; Maeda M; Mitsumori M; Kusui T; Hayakawa K
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Feb; 34(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 2754819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iopamidol for myelography. A clinical trial with a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Peeters F; van Dongen K; Hekster R; Hoogland P; Thijssen H; Tjian T; Wilmink J; Althuisius H
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(6):313-5. PubMed ID: 6357678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The optimum dose of iohexol 399 in excretory urography].
    Ohshima S; Matsuura O; Takeuchi N; Hattori R; Hashimoto J; Segawa A
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Aug; 35(8):1457-62. PubMed ID: 2683658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol.
    Rosenbaum DM; Caldicott WJ
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P; Mützel W; Taenzer V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.