These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17670765)

  • 1. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF?
    Boeckxstaens A; Devroey P; Collins J; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2660-4. PubMed ID: 17670765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychological sequelae of surgical reversal or of IVF after tubal ligation.
    Langer M; Hick P; Nemeskeri N; Schneider B; Ringlerl M
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 8485611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis.
    Hirshfeld-Cytron J; Winter J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 209(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23583214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tubal anastomosis after previous sterilization: a systematic review.
    van Seeters JAH; Chua SJ; Mol BWJ; Koks CAM
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 May; 23(3):358-370. PubMed ID: 28333337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unilateral laparoscopic tubal reversal versus IVF.
    Çetin C; Cetin MT; Ürünsak İF
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Sep; 23(9):771-4. PubMed ID: 24001156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors from tubal sterilization reversal by sutureless laparoscopical re-anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study.
    Schepens JJ; Mol BW; Wiegerinck MA; Houterman S; Koks CA
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 21115505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Relationship between microsurgical tubal reversal and ectopic pregnancy].
    Liu J; Fa Y; Lou D
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Jun; 77(6):412-4. PubMed ID: 9772502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Regret after sterilization in women].
    Vemer HM; Colla P; Schoot BC; Willemsen WN; Bierkens PB; Rolland R
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Mar; 130(9):410-3. PubMed ID: 3960188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microtubal reanastomosis: success rates as compared to in vitro fertilization.
    Hirth R; Zbella E; Sanchez M; Prieto J
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 20506680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization in women with previous tubal sterilization.
    Malacova E; Kemp A; Hart R; Jama-Alol K; Preen DB
    Contraception; 2015 Mar; 91(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 25499586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sutureless re-anastomosis by laparoscopy versus microsurgical re-anastomosis by laparotomy for sterilization reversal: a matched cohort study.
    Wiegerinck MA; Roukema M; van Kessel PH; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Aug; 20(8):2355-8. PubMed ID: 15860492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extensive excision of deep infiltrative endometriosis before in vitro fertilization significantly improves pregnancy rates.
    Bianchi PH; Pereira RM; Zanatta A; Alegretti JR; Motta EL; Serafini PC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19249705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of in vitro fertilization on the practice of gynecology and obstetrics.
    Jones HW
    Int J Fertil; 1986; 31(2):99, 102-5, 109-11. PubMed ID: 2875042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Microsurgical tubal desterilization: an efficient procedure. Evaluation of a 42 cases cohort according to Guzick's biparametric method].
    Hoffmann P; Racinet C; Bringer S; Desmons F; Ayoubi JM
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Jan; 38(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20022277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Regret after tubal sterilization].
    Nervo P; Bawin L; Foidart JM; Dubois M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Sep; 29(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 11011278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: a national prospective study.
    Lintsen AM; Eijkemans MJ; Hunault CC; Bouwmans CA; Hakkaart L; Habbema JD; Braat DD
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Sep; 22(9):2455-62. PubMed ID: 17636281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Psychosocial prognostic factors for refertilization or IvF after tubal sterilization].
    Langer M; Schreiner-Frech I; Nemeskeri N; Hick P; Ringler M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Mar; 55(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 7665059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy loss in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not predictive of subsequent delivery in women over 40 years.
    Sneeringer R; Klipstein S; Ryley DA; Alper MM; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):364-7. PubMed ID: 17482171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loupe microsurgical tubal sterilization reversal. Experience at a community-level naval hospital.
    Fischer RJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):855-9. PubMed ID: 8951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Caillet M; Vandromme J; Rozenberg S; Paesmans M; Germay O; Degueldre M
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1844-7. PubMed ID: 20004380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.