BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17671025)

  • 1. Impingement with total hip replacement.
    Malik A; Maheshwari A; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1832-42. PubMed ID: 17671025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impingement-dislocation risk of total hip replacement: effects of cup orientation and patient maneuvers.
    Ghaffari M; Nickmanesh R; Tamannaee N; Farahmand F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6801-4. PubMed ID: 23367491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
    Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.
    Weber M; Woerner M; Craiovan B; Voellner F; Worlicek M; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 27106215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup.
    Marchetti E; Krantz N; Berton C; Bocquet D; Fouilleron N; Migaud H; Girard J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 97(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21377948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.
    Barrack RL
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2003; 11(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 12670135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.
    Patel AB; Wagle RR; Usrey MM; Thompson MT; Incavo SJ; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.
    Kurtz WB; Ecker TM; Reichmann WM; Murphy SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19559561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone-on-bone versus hardware impingement in total hips: a biomechanical study.
    Elkins JM; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Iowa Orthop J; 2012; 32():17-21. PubMed ID: 23576916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loosening of total hip arthroplasty with a prosthesis employing a skirted femoral head.
    Chen PY; Wu CT; Hou CH; Hou SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2005 May; 104(5):370-3. PubMed ID: 15959607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners?
    Usrey MM; Noble PC; Rudner LJ; Conditt MA; Birman MV; Santore RF; Mathis KB
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16950064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty.
    Nadzadi ME; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11779644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Retrieval Analysis of Impingement in Dual-Mobility Liners.
    Scott TP; Weitzler L; Salvatore A; Wright TM; Westrich GH
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2660-2665. PubMed ID: 29661526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
    Gondi G; Roberson JR; Ganey TM; Shahriari A; Hutton WC
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.