These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17671025)

  • 21. The optimal combined anteversion pattern to achieve a favorable impingement-free angle in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Inoue D; Taga T; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Ueoka K; Tsuchiya H
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 May; 24(3):474-481. PubMed ID: 30554937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options.
    Hariri S; Chun S; Cowan JB; Bragdon C; Malchau H; Rubash HE
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1625-33. PubMed ID: 23886407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spontaneous dissociation of offset, face-changing polyethylene liners from the acetabular shell: a report of four cases.
    Gray CF; Moore RE; Lee GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 22552674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.
    Williams D; Royle M; Norton M
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
    Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Vigdorchik JM; Sharma AK; Elbuluk AM; Carroll KM; Mayman DJ; Lieberman JR
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):210-216. PubMed ID: 32741711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing.
    Gruen TA; Le Duff MJ; Wisk LE; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(16):1519-26. PubMed ID: 22204007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors affecting impingement and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty - Computer simulation analysis.
    Shoji T; Ota Y; Saka H; Murakami H; Takahashi W; Yamasaki T; Yasunaga Y; Iwamori H; Adachi N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105151. PubMed ID: 32836081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
    Plummer DR; Haughom BD; Della Valle CJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24267202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The dislocator, early and late: the 3 am phone call.
    Brooks PJ
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e476-8. PubMed ID: 21902136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impingement as a mechanism of dissociation of a metasul metal-on-metal liner.
    Malik A; Dorr LD; Long WT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):323.e13-6. PubMed ID: 18562156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Ceramic acetabular cups for hip endoprostheses. 7: How do position of the center of rotation and the CCD angle of the shaft modify range of motion and impingement?].
    Bader R; Willmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999 Dec; 44(12):345-51. PubMed ID: 10675990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty.
    Turley GA; Ahmed SM; Williams MA; Griffin DR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Aug; 225(8):769-82. PubMed ID: 21922954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Hip-Spine Relationship: The Importance of Femoral Version.
    Padgett DE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S99-S103. PubMed ID: 33526396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture of the Neck of a Lateral Flare Femoral Implant in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Breceda AP; DeRogatis MJ; Lee P; Vigorita VJ; Bryk E; Issack PS
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2018; 28(2):73-77. PubMed ID: 30317956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cup-neck impingement due to the malposition of the implant as a possible mechanism for metallosis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Onda K; Nagoya S; Kaya M; Yamashita T
    Orthopedics; 2008 Apr; 31(4):396. PubMed ID: 19292272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Notching of the femoral stem neck in metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a case report.
    Leung KH; Chiu KY; Ng FY; Yin L
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2013 Apr; 21(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 23630003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
    Miki H; Sugano N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Scheerlinck T
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):336-47. PubMed ID: 26280607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.