These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17671343)

  • 21. VOLUMETRIC LOCALISATION OF DENSE BREAST TISSUE USING BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS DATA.
    Dustler M; Petersson H; Timberg P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):392-7. PubMed ID: 26922782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
    Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.
    Engelken F; Bremme R; Bick U; Hammann-Kloss S; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e844-8. PubMed ID: 22647420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
    Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mass density images from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique.
    Hasnah MO; Parham C; Pisano ED; Zhong Z; Oltulu O; Chapman D
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):549-52. PubMed ID: 15789601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.
    Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Johnson RF; Nayeem F; Brunder DG; Ju H; Leonard MH; Grady JJ; Khamapirad T
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6903-27. PubMed ID: 23044556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parameter estimation in stochastic mammogram model by heuristic optimization techniques.
    Selvan SE; Xavier CC; Karssemeijer N; Sequeira J; Cherian RA; Dhala BY
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2006 Oct; 10(4):685-95. PubMed ID: 17044402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model.
    Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Cole EB; Marques HS; Yaffe MJ; Blevins M; Conant EF; Hendrick RE; Baum JK; Fajardo LL; Jong RA; Koomen MA; Kuzmiak CM; Lee Y; Pavic D; Yoon SC; Padungchaichote W; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 19703878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.
    Molloi S; Ding H; Feig S
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):1052-9. PubMed ID: 26031229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. X-ray phase-shifts-based method of volumetric breast density measurement.
    Wu X; Yan A; Liu H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4239-44. PubMed ID: 22830757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.