These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A; Schubö A J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink. Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention. Plewan T; Rinkenauer G Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 30030691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention. Jung K; Han SW; Min Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]