These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17672430)

  • 1. Attentional capture in serial audiovisual search tasks.
    Dalton P; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):422-38. PubMed ID: 17672430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overriding auditory attentional capture.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17557587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 30030691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Bischof WF; Di Lollo V
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1418-32. PubMed ID: 15813204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of synchronous audiovisual distractors on audiovisual temporal order judgments.
    Vatakis A; Bayliss L; Zampini M; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 17557599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal order judgments for audiovisual targets embedded in unimodal and bimodal distractor streams.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17010520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture.
    Harris AM; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2305-21. PubMed ID: 26018643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ear-catching? Real-world distractibility scores predict susceptibility to auditory attentional capture.
    Murphy S; Dalton P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1209-13. PubMed ID: 24563416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search.
    de Fockert J; Rees G; Frith C; Lavie N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):751-9. PubMed ID: 15200703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Now hear this: Inattentional deafness depends on task relatedness.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Cohen AJ; Cooper NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2527-2546. PubMed ID: 27351552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.