These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17672430)

  • 21. Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates.
    Matusz PJ; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Oct; 50(10):996-1009. PubMed ID: 23834379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.
    Folk CL; Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 12201333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multisensory enhancement of attentional capture in visual search.
    Matusz PJ; Eimer M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 21748418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons.
    Theeuwes J; De Vries GJ; Godijn R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 12956581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
    Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Nowak EJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):817-28. PubMed ID: 12956588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multisensory enhancement of attention depends on whether you are already paying attention.
    Lunn J; Sjoblom A; Ward J; Soto-Faraco S; Forster S
    Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():38-49. PubMed ID: 30825813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.