These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17672646)

  • 1. Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.
    Litvak LM; Spahr AJ; Saoji AA; Fridman GY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):982-91. PubMed ID: 17672646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
    Xu L; Zheng Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise.
    Bhattacharya A; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17672655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.
    Stickney GS; Assmann PF; Chang J; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1069-78. PubMed ID: 17672654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The performance of different synthesis signals in acoustic models of cochlear implants.
    Strydom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):920-33. PubMed ID: 21361449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.