These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17672652)

  • 1. Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17672652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent encoding of frequency and amplitude modulation in human auditory cortex: MEG evidence.
    Luo H; Wang Y; Poeppel D; Simon JZ
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 96(5):2712-23. PubMed ID: 16510774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults.
    D'haenens W; Dhooge I; De Vel E; Maes L; Bockstael A; Vinck BM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):399-406. PubMed ID: 17654081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of spread of excitation on the detection of amplitude modulation imposed on sinusoidal carriers at high levels.
    Millman RE; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1008-16. PubMed ID: 18247903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform.
    He NJ; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77. PubMed ID: 17614504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using individual differences to assess modulation-processing mechanisms and age effects.
    Paraouty N; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():38-49. PubMed ID: 27810287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separate influences of acoustic AM and FM sensitivity on the phonological decoding skills of impaired and normal readers.
    Witton C; Stein JF; Stoodley CJ; Rosner BS; Talcott JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 14(6):866-74. PubMed ID: 12191454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic aspects of the continuity illusion: perception of level and of the depth, rate, and phase of modulation.
    Lyzenga J; Carlyon RP; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):30-41. PubMed ID: 16125887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba S; Başkent D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():207-12. PubMed ID: 24269251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulated sounds: deficits after bilateral lesions of auditory cortex in the rat.
    Cooke JE; Zhang H; Kelly JB
    Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):90-9. PubMed ID: 17629425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of speech in reverberant conditions using AM-FM cochlear implant simulation.
    Drgas S; Blaszak MA
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):162-8. PubMed ID: 20603206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic amplitude coding in the auditory cortex of awake rhesus macaques.
    Malone BJ; Scott BH; Semple MN
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 98(3):1451-74. PubMed ID: 17615123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing.
    Zeng FG; Shannon RV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():235-8. PubMed ID: 7668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech: Amplitude Modulation Versus Amplitude Plus Frequency Modulation.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31246660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.
    Whiteford KL; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 18(4):619-633. PubMed ID: 28429126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A common neural code for frequency- and amplitude-modulated sounds.
    Saberi K; Hafter ER
    Nature; 1995 Apr; 374(6522):537-9. PubMed ID: 7700378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.