769 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17672920)
1. Transoesophageal echocardiography accurately detects cardiac output variation: a prospective comparison with thermodilution in cardiac surgery.
Parra V; Fita G; Rovira I; Matute P; Gomar C; Paré C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 17672920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transoesophageal echo-Doppler vs. thermodilution cardiac output measurement during hepatic vascular exclusion in liver transplantation.
Boucaud C; Bouffard Y; Dumortier J; Gaillac N; Sagnard P; Graber MC; Adham M; Boillot O
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Jun; 25(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 18298871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac output measurement during infrarenal aortic surgery: echo-esophageal Doppler versus thermodilution catheter.
Lafanechère A; Albaladejo P; Raux M; Geeraerts T; Bocquet R; Wernet A; Castier Y; Marty J
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2006 Feb; 20(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16458209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous arterial pressure waveform analysis accurately detects cardiac output in cardiac surgery: a prospective comparison with thermodilution, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance techniques.
Senay S; Toraman F; Gelmez S; Dağdelen S; Karabulut H; Alhan C
Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Apr; 12(2):E75-8. PubMed ID: 19383591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cardiac output as assessed by transesophageal echo-Doppler and transpulmonary thermodilution in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Diaper J; Ellenberger C; Villiger Y; Robert J; Inan C; Tschopp JM; Licker M
J Clin Anesth; 2010 Mar; 22(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20304350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring cardiac output during dobutamine infusion after off-pump coronary artery bypass: comparison of transesophageal echo-Doppler and thermodilution.
Husedzinović I; Barisin S; Tonković D; Sostarić S
Croat Med J; 2002 Dec; 43(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 12476476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution.
Mekis D; Kamenik M; Starc V; Jeretin S
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17850685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Lorsomradee S; Lorsomradee SR; Cromheecke S; De Hert SG
Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):979-83. PubMed ID: 17845647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transoesophageal echocardiography is unreliable for cardiac output assessment after cardiac surgery compared with thermodilution.
Bettex DA; Hinselmann V; Hellermann JP; Jenni R; Schmid ER
Anaesthesia; 2004 Dec; 59(12):1184-92. PubMed ID: 15549977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery by a new transesophageal Doppler device.
Jaeggi P; Hofer CK; Klaghofer R; Fodor P; Genoni M; Zollinger A
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 12698405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulse contour analysis after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients.
Sander M; von Heymann C; Foer A; von Dossow V; Grosse J; Dushe S; Konertz WF; Spies CD
Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):R729-34. PubMed ID: 16356221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation and feasibility of intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic cardiac output.
Culp WC; Ball TR; Burnett CJ
Anesth Analg; 2007 Nov; 105(5):1219-23, table of contents. PubMed ID: 17959944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Methods for Cardiac Output: Intraoperatively Doppler-Derived Cardiac Output Measured With 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Is Not Interchangeable With Cardiac Output by Pulmonary Catheter Thermodilution.
Graeser K; Zemtsovski M; Kofoed KF; Winther-Jensen M; Nilsson JC; Kjaergaard J; Møller-Sørensen H
Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 29324489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution].
Leone D; Servillo G; De Robertis E; Rossano F; Tufano R
Minerva Anestesiol; 1998; 64(7-8):351-6. PubMed ID: 9796245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cardiac output measurement using the CardioQP oesophageal Doppler with cardiac output measurement using thermodilution technique in children during heart catheterisation.
; Knirsch W; Kretschmar O; Tomaske M; Stutz K; Nagdyman N; Balmer C; Schmitz A; Berger F; Bauersfeld U; Weiss M
Anaesthesia; 2008 Aug; 63(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 18557743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical monitoring of cardiac output assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography in anaesthetised dogs: a comparison with the thermodilution technique.
Mantovani MM; Fantoni DT; Gimenes AM; de Castro JR; Flor PB; Ida KK; Schwartz DS
BMC Vet Res; 2017 Nov; 13(1):325. PubMed ID: 29121915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
