BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1767370)

  • 1. Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 1767370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis using different X-ray generators.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 May; 18(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 2635120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
    Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
    Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effects of postprocessing settings in digital bitewing radiographs on proximal caries detection.
    Abdinian M; Keshani F; Sadeghi F; Soltani P; Spagnuolo G; Rengo C
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e889. PubMed ID: 38712390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A pilot study of a modified radiographic technique for detecting early proximal cavities.
    Akbari M; Zarch HH; Movagharipour F; Ahrari F
    Caries Res; 2013; 47(6):612-6. PubMed ID: 24061285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions.
    Eli I; Weiss EI; Tzohar A; Littner MM; Gelernter I; Kaffe I
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 8990680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic versus clinical extension of Class II carious lesions using an F-speed film.
    Kooistra S; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Burt BA; Taylor GW
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 16382594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
    Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiography for the diagnosis of dental caries in posterior teeth.
    Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Clin Prev Dent; 1989; 11(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 2598573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentin and enamel thickness.
    Stroud JL; Buschang PH; Goaz PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 7835519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
    Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different developing solutions and developing times on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 2097224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.