These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17673971)

  • 1. Genomic selection for marker-assisted improvement in line crosses.
    Piyasatian N; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2007 Sep; 115(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 17673971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
    Verrier E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.
    Spindel J; Begum H; Akdemir D; Virk P; Collard B; Redoña E; Atlin G; Jannink JL; McCouch SR
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1004982. PubMed ID: 25689273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marker assisted selection for genetic improvement of animal populations when a single QTL is marked.
    Ruane J; Colleau JJ
    Genet Res; 1995 Aug; 66(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 8575670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model.
    Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Fernández J; Toro MA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1747-52. PubMed ID: 16024693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identity-by-descent genomic selection using selective and sparse genotyping for binary traits.
    Ødegård J; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):8. PubMed ID: 25888522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods of plant breeding in the genome era.
    Xu S; Hu Z
    Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Dec; 92(5-6):423-41. PubMed ID: 21429273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Island-Model Genomic Selection for Long-Term Genetic Improvement of Autogamous Crops.
    Yabe S; Yamasaki M; Ebana K; Hayashi T; Iwata H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153945. PubMed ID: 27115872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement.
    Desta ZA; Ortiz R
    Trends Plant Sci; 2014 Sep; 19(9):592-601. PubMed ID: 24970707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic response from marker assisted selection in an outbred population for differing marker bracket sizes and with two identified quantitative trait loci.
    Spelman R; Bovenhuis H
    Genetics; 1998 Mar; 148(3):1389-96. PubMed ID: 9539451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantile regression in genomic selection for oligogenic traits in autogamous plants: A simulation study.
    Oliveira GF; Nascimento ACC; Nascimento M; Sant'Anna IC; Romero JV; Azevedo CF; Bhering LL; Moura ETC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0243666. PubMed ID: 33400704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phenotypic versus marker-assisted selection for stalk strength and second-generation European corn borer resistance in maize.
    Flint-Garcia SA; Darrah LL; McMullen MD; Hibbard BE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1331-6. PubMed ID: 12928781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection of seed weight based on low-density SCAR markers in soybean.
    Shu YJ; Yu DS; Wang D; Bai X; Zhu YM; Guo CH
    Genet Mol Res; 2013 Jul; 12(3):2178-88. PubMed ID: 23884761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theoretical efficiency of multiple-trait quantitative trait loci-assisted selection.
    Togashi K; Lin CY
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Feb; 127(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 20074187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-family marker-assisted selection for aquaculture species.
    Sonesson AK
    Genet Sel Evol; 2007; 39(3):301-17. PubMed ID: 17433243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Will genomic selection be a practical method for plant breeding?
    Nakaya A; Isobe SN
    Ann Bot; 2012 Nov; 110(6):1303-16. PubMed ID: 22645117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic Selection Using Extreme Phenotypes and Pre-Selection of SNPs in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Chen J; Wan L; Wang Z
    Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2016 Oct; 18(5):575-583. PubMed ID: 27704224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.