These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes. Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Effect of timolol on central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density]. Grüb M; Leitritz M; Mielke J; Reinthal E; Bartz-Schmidt KU; Rohrbach JM Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):894-8. PubMed ID: 17131249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Herndon LW Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16552245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Factors influencing central corneal thickness in a Turkish population. Altinok A; Sen E; Yazici A; Aksakal FN; Oncul H; Koklu G Curr Eye Res; 2007 May; 32(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 17514526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The corneal endothelial cells in ocular hypertension. Hong C; Kandori T; Kitazawa Y; Tanishima T Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1982; 26(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 7131927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mean intraocular pressure and progression based on corneal thickness in patients with ocular hypertension. Konstas AG; Irkec MT; Teus MA; Cvenkel B; Astakhov YS; Sharpe ED; Hollo G; Mylopoulos N; Bozkurt B; Pizzamiglio C; Potyomkin VV; Alemu AM; Nasser QJ; Stewart JA; Stewart WC Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 17917683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Central thickness of the cornea in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma]. Chiseliţă D; Danielescu C; Gagos-Zaharia O; Gherman C Oftalmologia; 2007; 51(3):98-103. PubMed ID: 18064964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Association between corneal thickness, mean intraocular pressure, disease stability and severity, and cost of treatment in glaucoma: a Canadian analysis. Walker JH; Buys Y; Trope G; Vicente C; Einarson TR; Covert D; Iskedjian M Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Apr; 21(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 15899096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Central and peripheral pachymetry measurements according to age using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. Khoramnia R; Rabsilber TM; Auffarth GU J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 17466857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Wolfs RC; Klaver CC; Vingerling JR; Grobbee DE; Hofman A; de Jong PT Am J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 123(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 9535620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Central corneal thickness in adult South Indians: the Chennai Glaucoma Study. Vijaya L; George R; Arvind H; Ve Ramesh S; Baskaran M; Raju P; Asokan R; Velumuri L Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):700-4. PubMed ID: 20079536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Boehm AG; Weber A; Pillunat LE; Koch R; Spoerl E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2472-7. PubMed ID: 18316699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]