These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

616 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17676998)

  • 1. Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits.
    Servin B; Stephens M
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Jul; 3(7):e114. PubMed ID: 17676998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical issues in imputation-based association mapping.
    Guan Y; Stephens M
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Dec; 4(12):e1000279. PubMed ID: 19057666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.
    MacLeod IM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Haile-Mariam M; Kemper KE; Chamberlain AJ; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Feb; 17():144. PubMed ID: 26920147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tag SNP selection for candidate gene association studies using HapMap and gene resequencing data.
    Xu Z; Kaplan NL; Taylor JA
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Oct; 15(10):1063-70. PubMed ID: 17568388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MLR-tagging: informative SNP selection for unphased genotypes based on multiple linear regression.
    He J; Zelikovsky A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2558-61. PubMed ID: 16895924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DISTMIX: direct imputation of summary statistics for unmeasured SNPs from mixed ethnicity cohorts.
    Lee D; Bigdeli TB; Williamson VS; Vladimirov VI; Riley BP; Fanous AH; Bacanu SA
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3099-104. PubMed ID: 26059716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNP analysis to results (SNPator): a web-based environment oriented to statistical genomics analyses upon SNP data.
    Morcillo-Suarez C; Alegre J; Sangros R; Gazave E; de Cid R; Milne R; Amigo J; Ferrer-Admetlla A; Moreno-Estrada A; Gardner M; Casals F; Pérez-Lezaun A; Comas D; Bosch E; Calafell F; Bertranpetit J; Navarro A
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(14):1643-4. PubMed ID: 18515823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding genome-transcriptome-phenome association with structured association mapping and visualization in GenAMap.
    Curtis RE; Yin J; Kinnaird P; Xing EP
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2012; ():327-38. PubMed ID: 22174288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CandiSNPer: a web tool for the identification of candidate SNPs for causal variants.
    Schmitt AO; Assmus J; Bortfeldt RH; Brockmann GA
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 26(7):969-70. PubMed ID: 20172942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian model for detection of high-order interactions among genetic variants in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang J; Joshi T; Valliyodan B; Shi H; Liang Y; Nguyen HT; Zhang J; Xu D
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():1011. PubMed ID: 26607428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FAPI: Fast and accurate P-value Imputation for genome-wide association study.
    Kwan JS; Li MX; Deng JE; Sham PC
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 May; 24(5):761-6. PubMed ID: 26306642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyses and comparison of accuracy of different genotype imputation methods.
    Pei YF; Li J; Zhang L; Papasian CJ; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3551. PubMed ID: 18958166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linkage disequilibrium-based quality control for large-scale genetic studies.
    Scheet P; Stephens M
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Aug; 4(8):e1000147. PubMed ID: 18670630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where is the causal variant? On the advantage of the family design over the case-control design in genetic association studies.
    Dandine-Roulland C; Perdry H
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1357-63. PubMed ID: 25585700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Imputation Accuracy by Inferring Causal Variants in Genetic Studies.
    Wu Y; Hormozdiari F; Joo JWJ; Eskin E
    J Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1203-1213. PubMed ID: 30272994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of gene-based rare variant association mapping methods for quantitative traits in a bovine population with complex familial relationships.
    Zhang Q; Guldbrandtsen B; Calus MP; Lund MS; Sahana G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):60. PubMed ID: 27534618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multi-trait meta-analysis with imputed sequence variants reveals twelve QTL for mammary gland morphology in Fleckvieh cattle.
    Pausch H; Emmerling R; Schwarzenbacher H; Fries R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():14. PubMed ID: 26883850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.