These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17677361)

  • 1. Method for modeling transport of particles in realistic porous networks: application to the computation of NMR flow propagators.
    Picard G; Frey K
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Jun; 75(6 Pt 2):066311. PubMed ID: 17677361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NMR relaxation and pulsed field gradient study of alginate bead porous media.
    Britton MM; Graham RG; Packer KJ
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Aug; 169(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 15261615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The characterisation of fluid transport in porous solids by means of pulsed magnetic field gradient NMR.
    Packer KJ; Stapf S; Tessier JJ; Damion RA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 16(5-6):463-9. PubMed ID: 9803891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining NMR flow propagator moments in porous rocks without the influence of relaxation.
    Mitchell J; Graf von der Schulenburg DA; Holland DJ; Fordham EJ; Johns ML; Gladden LF
    J Magn Reson; 2008 Aug; 193(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 18514556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fast random walk algorithm for computing the pulsed-gradient spin-echo signal in multiscale porous media.
    Grebenkov DS
    J Magn Reson; 2011 Feb; 208(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 21159532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NMR propagator measurements on flow through a random pack of porous glass beads and how they are affected by dispersion, relaxation, and internal field inhomogeneities.
    Scheven UM; Seland JG; Cory DG
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Feb; 69(2 Pt 1):021201. PubMed ID: 14995433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rapid measurement of flow propagators in porous rocks.
    Mitchell J; Sederman AJ; Fordham EJ; Johns ML; Gladden LF
    J Magn Reson; 2008 Apr; 191(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 18226938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A PGSE study of propane gas flow through model porous bead packs.
    Codd SL; Altobelli SA
    J Magn Reson; 2003 Jul; 163(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 12852903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous-time random-walk model of transport in variably saturated heterogeneous porous media.
    Zoia A; Néel MC; Cortis A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Mar; 81(3 Pt 1):031104. PubMed ID: 20365694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of spatially-resolved porosity, tracer distributions and diffusion coefficients in porous media using MRI measurements and numerical simulations.
    Marica F; Jofré SA; Mayer KU; Balcom BJ; Al TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Jul; 125(1-4):47-56. PubMed ID: 21669472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of diffusion on transverse dispersion in two-dimensional ordered and random porous media.
    Hlushkou D; Piatrusha S; Tallarek U
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Jun; 95(6-1):063108. PubMed ID: 28709263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-gradient pulse investigations of fluid transport in porous media.
    Stapf S; Blümich B
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):385-9. PubMed ID: 11445316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model to interpret pulsed-field-gradient NMR data including memory and superdispersion effects.
    Néel MC; Bauer D; Fleury M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(6):062121. PubMed ID: 25019739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flow and transport studies in (non)consolidated porous (bio)systems consisting of solid or porous beads by PFG NMR.
    Van As H; Palstra W; Tallarek U; Van Dusschoten D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 16(5-6):569-73. PubMed ID: 9803911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictions of non-Fickian solute transport in different classes of porous media using direct simulation on pore-scale images.
    Bijeljic B; Raeini A; Mostaghimi P; Blunt MJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jan; 87(1):013011. PubMed ID: 23410430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of the velocity acceleration factor for colloidal transport in porous media using NMR.
    Creber SA; Pintelon TR; Johns ML
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Nov; 339(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 19660763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NMR measurement of hydrodynamic dispersion in porous media subject to biofilm mediated precipitation reactions.
    Fridjonsson EO; Seymour JD; Schultz LN; Gerlach R; Cunningham AB; Codd SL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Mar; 120-121():79-88. PubMed ID: 20800317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterizing dispersivity and stagnation in porous media using NMR flow propagators.
    Singer PM; Mitchell J; Fordham EJ
    J Magn Reson; 2016 Sep; 270():98-107. PubMed ID: 27434778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation and analysis of solute transport in 2D fracture/pipe networks: the SOLFRAC program.
    Bodin J; Porel G; Delay F; Ubertosi F; Bernard S; de Dreuzy JR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jan; 89(1-2):1-28. PubMed ID: 16962206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observation of electro-osmotic flow echoes in porous media by nuclear magnetic resonance.
    Bendel P; Bernardo M; Dunsmuir JH; Thomann H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2003 Apr; 67(4 Pt 2):046307. PubMed ID: 12786487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.