146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17678511)
1. Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.
Gallego G; Taylor SJ; McNeill P; Brien JA
Health Expect; 2007 Sep; 10(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 17678511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Setting priorities for high-cost medications in public hospitals in Australia: should the public be involved?
Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
Aust Health Rev; 2011 May; 35(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21612733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Priority setting for high cost medications (HCMs) in public hospitals in Australia: a case study.
Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
Health Policy; 2007 Nov; 84(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17618009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Priority to End of Life Treatments? Views of the Public in the Netherlands.
Wouters S; van Exel J; Baker R; B F Brouwer W
Value Health; 2017 Jan; 20(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 28212951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Funding and access to high cost medicines in public hospitals in Australia: decision-makers' perspectives.
Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
Health Policy; 2009 Sep; 92(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 19269709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Rationing health care by thresholds for clinical benefit and its acceptance by the German population].
Schöne-Seifert B; Friedrich DR; Diederich A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):426-34. PubMed ID: 22857730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Critical reflections on the prioritisation debate: are we setting the right priorities to address our prioritisation challenges?].
Penner A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 22857725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Equal access for equal need: Eliciting public preferences for access to health treatment by employment status.
Gibbs N; Powell PA; Tsuchiya A
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Feb; 222():246-255. PubMed ID: 30665064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prioritization and resource allocation in health care: the views of older people receiving continuous public care and service.
Werntoft E; Hallberg IR; Edberg AK
Health Expect; 2007 Jun; 10(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17524005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationing hospital services in Hong Kong: priority setting by clinicians using the Delphi method.
Yuen PP; Gould D; Cheng MY
Health Serv Manage Res; 2002 Feb; 15(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11854991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Community views and public health priority setting: how do health department priorities, community views, and health indicator data compare?
Earle-Richardson G; Scribani M; Wyckoff L; Strogatz D; May J; Jenkins P
Health Promot Pract; 2015 Jan; 16(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25082983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.
Lees A; Scott N; Scott SN; MacDonald S; Campbell C
Health Expect; 2002 Mar; 5(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11906541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Priority setting in healthcare. What can Germany learn from other countries?].
Busse R; Hoffmann C
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Sep; 53(9):882-9. PubMed ID: 20853084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationing access to care to the medically uninsured: the role of bureaucratic front-line discretion at large healthcare institutions.
Weiner SJ; Laporte M; Abrams RI; Moswin A; Warnecke R
Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 15076806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the preferences of health professionals and members of the public for setting health care priorities : experiences from Australia.
Wiseman V
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 16162032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding what matters: An exploratory study to investigate the views of the general public for priority setting criteria in health care.
Ratcliffe J; Lancsar E; Walker R; Gu Y
Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):653-662. PubMed ID: 28411964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Schor EL;
Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public views on principles for health care priority setting: findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology.
van Exel J; Baker R; Mason H; Donaldson C; Brouwer W;
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Feb; 126():128-37. PubMed ID: 25550076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
