These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17678526)

  • 1. Combination of scoring schemes for protein docking.
    Heuser P; Schomburg D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():279. PubMed ID: 17678526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimised amino acid specific weighting factors for unbound protein docking.
    Heuser P; Schomburg D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():344. PubMed ID: 16842615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties.
    Bernauer J; Azé J; Janin J; Poupon A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 17237048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical prediction of protein chemical interactions based on chemical structure and mass spectrometry data.
    Nagamine N; Sakakibara Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(15):2004-12. PubMed ID: 17510168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting disulfide connectivity from protein sequence using multiple sequence feature vectors and secondary structure.
    Song J; Yuan Z; Tan H; Huber T; Burrage K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3147-54. PubMed ID: 17942444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of zinc-binding sites in proteins from sequence.
    Shu N; Zhou T; Hovmöller S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 24(6):775-82. PubMed ID: 18245129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient comprehensive scoring of docked protein complexes using probabilistic support vector machines.
    Martin O; Schomburg D
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1367-78. PubMed ID: 17894343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures.
    Kowalsman N; Eisenstein M
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 17040920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?
    Feliu E; Oliva B
    Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3376-85. PubMed ID: 20848549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partial correlation coefficient between distance matrices as a new indicator of protein-protein interactions.
    Sato T; Yamanishi Y; Horimoto K; Kanehisa M; Toh H
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2488-92. PubMed ID: 16882650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mining HIV protease cleavage data using genetic programming with a sum-product function.
    Yang ZR; Dalby AR; Qiu J
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3398-405. PubMed ID: 15256407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moment invariants as shape recognition technique for comparing protein binding sites.
    Sommer I; Müller O; Domingues FS; Sander O; Weickert J; Lengauer T
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3139-46. PubMed ID: 17977888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
    Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century.
    Aloy P; Pichaud M; Russell RB
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15718128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrative approach for predicting interactions of protein regions.
    Schelhorn SE; Lengauer T; Albrecht M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i35-41. PubMed ID: 18689837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ensemble of K-local hyperplanes for predicting protein-protein interactions.
    Nanni L; Lumini A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(10):1207-10. PubMed ID: 16481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces.
    Douguet D; Chen HC; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(21):2612-8. PubMed ID: 16928732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.