465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17678734)
1. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Futamatsu H; Wilke N; Klassen C; Shoemaker S; Angiolillo DJ; Siuciak A; Morikawa-Futamatsu K; Suzuki N; von Ziegler F; Bass TA; Costa MA
Am Heart J; 2007 Aug; 154(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 17643580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease.
Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Dohi K; Ishida M; Tanigawa T; Yamada A; Takase S; Nakajima H; Sawai T; Masuda J; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Fujii E; Yamada N; Ito M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jan; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29432130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire.
Kurita T; Sakuma H; Onishi K; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Yamanaka T; Tanigawa T; Kitamura T; Takeda K; Ito M
Eur Heart J; 2009 Feb; 30(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 19098020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements.
Ben Bouallègue F; Roubille F; Lattuca B; Cung TT; Macia JC; Gervasoni R; Leclercq F; Mariano-Goulart D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1712-7. PubMed ID: 26338893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.
Jogiya R; Kozerke S; Morton G; De Silva K; Redwood S; Perera D; Nagel E; Plein S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 60(8):756-65. PubMed ID: 22818072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis.
Kühl HP; Katoh M; Buhr C; Krombach GA; Hoffmann R; Rassaf T; Neizel M; Buecker A; Kelm M
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1090-5. PubMed ID: 17437733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Hussain ST; Chiribiri A; Morton G; Bettencourt N; Schuster A; Paul M; Perera D; Nagel E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Jul; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 27430288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla: a comparison to fractional flow reserve.
Bernhardt P; Walcher T; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):2049-56. PubMed ID: 22476908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship of vasodilator-induced changes in myocardial oxygenation with the severity of coronary artery stenosis: a study using oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Luu JM; Friedrich MG; Harker J; Dwyer N; Guensch D; Mikami Y; Faris P; Hare JL
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1358-67. PubMed ID: 25104812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.
Leone AM; Scalone G; De Maria GL; Tagliaferro F; Gardi A; Clemente F; Basile E; Cialdella P; De Caterina AR; Porto I; Aurigemma C; Burzotta F; Niccoli G; Trani C; Rebuzzi AG; Crea F
EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 25007836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
