BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17678916)

  • 1. Revealing the enigmas of implantation: what is the true impact of ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17678916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting?
    Van Voorhis BJ; Dokras A
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 17511991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization alters endometrial receptivity in humans: protocol effects.
    Haouzi D; Assou S; Dechanet C; Anahory T; Dechaud H; De Vos J; Hamamah S
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Apr; 82(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 20042535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Excessive ovarian stimulation up-regulates the Wnt-signaling molecule DKK1 in human endometrium and may affect implantation: an in vitro co-culture study.
    Liu Y; Kodithuwakku SP; Ng PY; Chai J; Ng EH; Yeung WS; Ho PC; Lee KF
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Feb; 25(2):479-90. PubMed ID: 19955106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):344-8. PubMed ID: 21737072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uterine receptivity and the ramifications of ovarian stimulation on endometrial function.
    Horcajadas JA; Díaz-Gimeno P; Pellicer A; Simón C
    Semin Reprod Med; 2007 Nov; 25(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 17960530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):516-8. PubMed ID: 21737071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adequate ovarian follicular status does not prevent the decrease in pregnancy rates associated with high sperm DNA fragmentation.
    Frydman N; Prisant N; Hesters L; Frydman R; Tachdjian G; Cohen-Bacrie P; Fanchin R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 17482180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Endometrial preparation in oocyte recipients].
    Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Mayenga JM; Kulski O; Belaid Y; Grefenstette I; Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):507-10. PubMed ID: 22906698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [In vitro fertilization (IVF): why doing it in unstimulated cycles?].
    Basille C; Fay S; Hesters L; Frydman N; Frydman R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):877-80. PubMed ID: 17827049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical outcome of patients with follicular development retardation by prolonged duration of gonadotropin administration for in vitro fertilization].
    Chen SL; Sun L; Kong LH; Li L; Li J; Zhu L; Gao TM; Xing FQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 42(8):526-9. PubMed ID: 17983490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frozen embryo transfer: the present practice and beyond.
    Chaudhuri AR; Chatterjee S
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2013; 24(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 23337055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity.
    Orvieto R; Meltzer S; Rabinson J; Zohav E; Anteby EY; Nahum R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1294-6. PubMed ID: 18178197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer during natural cycles.
    Ng EH; Chui DK; Tang OS; Lau EY; Yeung WS; Chung HP
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Feb; 46(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11255822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expression of L-selectin ligands in human endometrium during the implantation window after controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation.
    Lai TH; Zhao Y; Shih IeM; Ho CL; Bankowski B; Vlahos N
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):761-3. PubMed ID: 16500358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HOX genes in implantation.
    Vitiello D; Kodaman PH; Taylor HS
    Semin Reprod Med; 2007 Nov; 25(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 17960527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endometrial gene expression in the window of implantation is altered in obese women especially in association with polycystic ovary syndrome.
    Bellver J; Martínez-Conejero JA; Labarta E; Alamá P; Melo MA; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Horcajadas JA
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2335-41, 2341.e1-8. PubMed ID: 21481376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene expression in cultured endometrium from women with different outcomes following IVF.
    Bersinger NA; Wunder DM; Birkhäuser MH; Mueller MD
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2008 Aug; 14(8):475-84. PubMed ID: 18539642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.