126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1767916)
41. Computational modelling of blood-flow-induced changes in blood electrical conductivity and its contribution to the impedance cardiogram.
Trakic A; Akhand M; Wang H; Mason D; Liu F; Wilson S; Crozier S
Physiol Meas; 2010 Jan; 31(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 19940342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Experimental and numerical study on optimal spot-electrodes arrays in transthoracic electrical impedance cardiography.
Ikarashi A; Nogawa M; Tanaka S; Yamakoshi K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4580-3. PubMed ID: 18003025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Measurement of cardiac stroke volume during cesarean section: a comparison between impedance cardiography and the dye dilution technique.
Milsom I; Forssman L; Biber B; Dottori O; Sivertsson R
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1983 Oct; 27(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 6356759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The measurement of cardia output by the thoracic impedance method.
Adamicza A; Tutsek L; Nagy S
Acta Physiol Hung; 1988; 71(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 3421117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Thermodilution estimation of cardiac output at high flows in anesthetized horses.
Dunlop CI; Hodgson DS; Chapman PL; Grandy JL; Waldron RD
Am J Vet Res; 1991 Nov; 52(11):1893-7. PubMed ID: 1785735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance with acetylene uptake for measuring cardiac output.
Wang E; Cruz C; Pettersen MR; Hoff J; Helgerud J
Int J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 35(11):925-32. PubMed ID: 24886928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow(R)] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.
Taylor K; Manlhiot C; McCrindle B; Grosse-Wortmann L; Holtby H
Anesth Analg; 2012 Apr; 114(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 22314693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of cardiac output by ultrasound dilution technique in infants and children: a validation study against direct Fick principle.
Boehne M; Baustert M; Paetzel V; Köditz H; Schoof S; Happel CM; Bertram H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Mar; 112(3):469-76. PubMed ID: 24335550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence: influence of age and gender.
Sathyaprabha TN; Pradhan C; Rashmi G; Thennarasu K; Raju TR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Dec; 22(6):401-8. PubMed ID: 19005768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients.
Barry BN; Mallick A; Bodenham AR; Vucevic M
Crit Care; 1997; 1(2):71-74. PubMed ID: 11056698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [A computer-assisted noninvasive monitoring system with graphic display of online determination of cardiovascular parameters].
Castor G; Motsch J; Altmayer P; Molter G
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989 Nov; 34(11):262-7. PubMed ID: 2605290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output in CAPD patients.
Ng HW; Walleyl TJ; Tsao Y; Fahal IH; Ahmad R; Breckenridge AM
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1995; 17(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7623522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output.
Trinkmann F; Berger M; Doesch C; Papavassiliu T; Schoenberg SO; Borggrefe M; Kaden JJ; Saur J
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Aug; 30(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 26115774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Usefulness of thoracic electrical bioimpedance in detection of ejection fraction changes.
Hartleb M; Rudzki K; Waluga M; Janusz M; Karpel E
J Physiol Pharmacol; 2000 Mar; 51(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 10768858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Assumed oxygen consumption based on calculation from dye dilution cardiac output: an improved formula.
Bergstra A; van Dijk RB; Hillege HL; Lie KI; Mook GA
Eur Heart J; 1995 May; 16(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 7588904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications.
Moshkovitz Y; Kaluski E; Milo O; Vered Z; Cotter G
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2004 May; 19(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 15096956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Electrical Cardiometry: A Reliable Solution to Cardiac Output Estimation in Children With Structural Heart Disease.
Narula J; Chauhan S; Ramakrishnan S; Gupta SK
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Jun; 31(3):912-917. PubMed ID: 28262447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output: studies in rabbits.
Pappas CG; Wang X; Connolly RJ; Schwaitzberg SD
J Surg Res; 1995 Oct; 59(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 7564325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reliability of peak VO(2) and maximal cardiac output assessed using thoracic bioimpedance in children.
Welsman J; Bywater K; Farr C; Welford D; Armstrong N
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2005 Jun; 94(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 15827735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
