These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17679204)

  • 21. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mammography screening for breast cancer].
    Drozdz W; Strzałka M
    Przegl Lek; 1998; 55(12):663-8. PubMed ID: 10354718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer.
    Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2008 May; 299(18):2203-5. PubMed ID: 18477789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark.
    Bihrmann K; Jensen A; Olsen AH; Njor S; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 18416951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guidelines for screening mammography: the controversy.
    DeBuono BA; Fulton JP
    R I Med; 1994 Oct; 77(10):360-1. PubMed ID: 7803869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):859-78. PubMed ID: 20868890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Ability of subtraction and dynamic MR imaging to detect breast tumors: comparison with ultrasonography and mammography].
    Terao E; Takeuchi H; Iwamura A; Murakami Y; Harada J; Tada S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 54(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 7971186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Current technologies of screening for breast cancer].
    Rozhkova NI; Bozhenko VK
    Vopr Onkol; 2009; 55(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 19947380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Imaging methods in the current diagnosis of and screening for breast cancer].
    Forrai G; Szabó E; Ormándi K; Ambrózay E; Péntek Z; Milics M; Rajtár M; Sinkovics I
    Magy Onkol; 2010 Sep; 54(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 20870598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Breast examination in women from the Pałuk region].
    Kabuła S; Burzyńska-Makuch M; Kozłowska R; Kłyszejko C; Koźma J; Boroń Z
    Wiad Lek; 1994 Mar; 47(5-6):176-80. PubMed ID: 7941555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rationale and technique of clinical breast examination.
    Freund KM
    Medscape Womens Health; 2000 Nov; 5(6):E2. PubMed ID: 11320350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening for breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Gabe R; Tabár L; Yen AM; Chen TH
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):671-97. PubMed ID: 16226686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast cancer screening methods: a review of the evidence.
    Vahabi M
    Health Care Women Int; 2003 Nov; 24(9):773-93. PubMed ID: 14742116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trends in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
    Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2008 Mar; 75 Suppl 1():S2-9. PubMed ID: 18457191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
    Weinstein S; Rosen M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis.
    Bevers TB; Anderson BO; Bonaccio E; Borgen PI; Buys S; Daly MB; Dempsey PJ; Farrar WB; Fleming I; Garber JE; Harris RE; Helvie M; Hoover S; Krontiras H; Shaw S; Singletary E; Sugg Skinner C; Smith ML; Tsangaris TN; Wiley EL; Williams C;
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2006 May; 4(5):480-508. PubMed ID: 16687096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Early detection of breast cancer].
    Schreer I; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
    Gynakologe; 1994 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8168732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.