216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17679324)
1. Shear-modulus estimation by application of spatially-modulated impulsive acoustic radiation force.
McAleavey SA; Menon M; Orszulak J
Ultrason Imaging; 2007 Apr; 29(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 17679324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quasi-plane shear wave propagation induced by acoustic radiation force with a focal line region: a simulation study.
Guo M; Abbott D; Lu M; Liu H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Mar; 39(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 26768475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force.
Palmeri ML; Wang MH; Dahl JJ; Frinkley KD; Nightingale KR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 34(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 18222031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus.
Pagé G; Bied M; Garteiser P; Van Beers B; Etaix N; Fraschini C; Bel-Brunon A; Gennisson JL
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37703895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear modulus imaging with spatially-modulated ultrasound radiation force.
McAleavey S; Menon M; Elegbe E
Ultrason Imaging; 2009 Oct; 31(4):217-34. PubMed ID: 20458875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear elastic modulus estimation from indentation and SDUV on gelatin phantoms.
Amador C; Urban MW; Chen S; Chen Q; An KN; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1706-14. PubMed ID: 21317078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results.
Nightingale K; McAleavey S; Trahey G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1715-23. PubMed ID: 14698339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustoelasticity in soft solids: assessment of the nonlinear shear modulus with the acoustic radiation force.
Gennisson JL; Rénier M; Catheline S; Barrière C; Bercoff J; Tanter M; Fink M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3211-9. PubMed ID: 18247733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of SMURF estimation of shear modulus in hydrogels.
McAleavey S; Collins E; Kelly J; Elegbe E; Menon M
Ultrason Imaging; 2009 Apr; 31(2):131-50. PubMed ID: 19630254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic mechanical response of elastic spherical inclusions to impulsive acoustic radiation force excitation.
Palmeri ML; McAleavey SA; Fong KL; Trahey GE; Nightingale KR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2065-79. PubMed ID: 17091842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A finite-element method model of soft tissue response to impulsive acoustic radiation force.
Palmeri ML; Sharma AC; Bouchard RR; Nightingale RW; Nightingale KR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1699-712. PubMed ID: 16382621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localized harmonic motion imaging: theory, simulations and experiments.
Konofagou EE; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1405-13. PubMed ID: 14597337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidelines for Finite-Element Modeling of Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Shear Wave Propagation in Tissue-Mimicking Media.
Palmeri ML; Qiang B; Chen S; Urban MW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 28026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of material properties of soft solid thin layers with acoustic radiation force and wave propagation.
Urban MW; Nenadic IZ; Qiang B; Bernal M; Chen S; Greenleaf JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2499-507. PubMed ID: 26520332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear wave elasticity imaging based on acoustic radiation force and optical detection.
Cheng Y; Li R; Li S; Dunsby C; Eckersley RJ; Elson DS; Tang MX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-45. PubMed ID: 22749816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitored steady-state excitation and recovery (MSSER) radiation force imaging using viscoelastic models.
Mauldin FW; Haider MA; Loboa EG; Behler RH; Euliss LE; Pfeiler TW; Gallippi CM
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1597-610. PubMed ID: 18986950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loss tangent and complex modulus estimated by acoustic radiation force creep and shear wave dispersion.
Amador C; Urban MW; Chen S; Greenleaf JF
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1263-82. PubMed ID: 22345425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two methods for the generation of spatially modulated ultrasound radiation force.
Elegbe EC; Menon MG; McAleavey SA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Jul; 58(7):1344-54. PubMed ID: 21768019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transient displacement induced in shear wave elastography: comparison between analytical results and ultrasound measurements.
Elkateb Hachemi M; Callé S; Remenieras JP
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e221-5. PubMed ID: 16843510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
