152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17679958)
1. [The use of magnetic resonance contrast agents for selective digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography with contrast enhancement].
Kokov LS; Karmazanovskiĭ GG; Likharev AY; Shimanovskiĭ NL
Angiol Sosud Khir; 2006; 12(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 17679958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Gadolinium in arteriography and interventional radiology: 39 patients].
Robert A; Bonneville F; Miralbes S; Huart JY; Cattin F; Quantin N; Bonneville JF
J Radiol; 2002 Nov; 83(11):1759-63. PubMed ID: 12469013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of gadolinium chelates for X-ray digital subtraction angiography.
Wagner HJ; Kalinowski M; Klose KJ; Alfke H
Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 11323513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. X-ray digital subtraction angiography with 1 mol/L gadobutrol: results from a comparative porcine study With iodinated contrast agents.
Kalinowski M; Kress O; Wels T; Alfke H; Klose KJ; Wagner HJ
Invest Radiol; 2002 May; 37(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 11979151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical CT angiography comparing routine noncontrast and a late venous scan as masks for automated bone subtraction: feasibility study and examination of the influence of patient motion on image quality.
Lell MM; Ditt H; Panknin C; Sayre JW; Klotz E; Ruehm SG; Villablanca JP
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18097274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gadolinium-based contrast media compared with iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in azotaemic patients.
Erley CM; Bader BD; Berger ED; Tuncel N; Winkler S; Tepe G; Risler T; Duda S
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2526-31. PubMed ID: 15280530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of gadolinium as an intraarterial contrast agent in digital subtraction angiography of the cervical carotid arteries and intracranial circulation. Technical note.
Nussbaum ES; Casey SO; Sebring LA; Madison MT
J Neurosurg; 2000 May; 92(5):881-3. PubMed ID: 10794307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed radiography angiography using storage phosphor imaging plates: eight year's experience.
Kudo S; Kato A; Uchino A; Matsuo Y; Mizuguchi M; Fukahori T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu T
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9278369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia?
Nyman U; Elmståhl B; Leander P; Nilsson M; Golman K; Almén T
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):311-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 11997530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. K-edge digital subtraction imaging with dichromatic x-ray sources: SNR and dose studies.
Sarnelli A; Elleaume H; Taibi A; Gambaccini M; Bravin A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4311-28. PubMed ID: 16912383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient with Leriche's syndrome and concomitant superior mesenteric aneurysm: evaluation with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Chan HH; Tai KS; Yip LK
Australas Radiol; 2005 Jun; 49(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15932467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MD CT angiography and MR angiography of nonatherosclerotic renal artery disease.
Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C; Ahmad EA; Norton PT; Turba UC; Bozlar U; Hagspiel KD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1151-64. PubMed ID: 21681628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.
Racadio JM; Kashinkunti SR; Nachabe RA; Racadio JM; Johnson ND; Kukreja KU; Patel MN; Privitera MB; Hales JE; Abruzzo TA
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1491-501. PubMed ID: 23736781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gadolinium-DTPA as X-ray contrast medium in clinical studies.
Albrecht T; Dawson P
Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):878-82. PubMed ID: 11026864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between gadolinium and iodine contrast for percutaneous intervention in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: clinical outcomes.
Kane GC; Stanson AW; Kalnicka D; Rosenthal DW; Lee CU; Textor SC; Garovic VD
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Apr; 23(4):1233-40. PubMed ID: 18256017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT angiography with gadolinium-based contrast media.
Bonvento MJ; Moore WH; Button TM; Weinmann HJ; Yakupov R; Dilmanian FA
Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):979-85. PubMed ID: 16843850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepatic blood supply: comparison of optimized dual phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Kopka L; Rodenwaldt J; Vosshenrich R; Fischer U; Renner B; Lorf T; Graessner J; Ringe B; Grabbe E
Radiology; 1999 Apr; 211(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 10189453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
