650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680226)
1. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
Treutwein M; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Verification and application of the voxel-based Monte Carlo (VMC++) electron dose module of Oncentra MasterPlan].
Scherf C; Scherer J; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Feb; 183(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17294112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo-based treatment-planning system for electron beams].
Mika S; Christ G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Mar; 183(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17340074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A deterministic partial differential equation model for dose calculation in electron radiotherapy.
Duclous R; Dubroca B; Frank M
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3843-57. PubMed ID: 20571208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional inserts and an add-on electron MLC for chest wall irradiation of left-sided breast cancer.
Vatanen T; Traneus E; Lahtinen T
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 18932098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
