159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680303)
1. Embolization materials made of gelatin: comparison between Gelpart and gelatin microspheres.
Ohta S; Nitta N; Sonoda A; Seko A; Tanaka T; Takazakura R; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Sakamoto T; Tabata Y; Murata K
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Feb; 33(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17680303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Degradable gelatin microspheres as an embolic agent: an experimental study in a rabbit renal model.
Ohta S; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Murata K; Tabata Y
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):418-28. PubMed ID: 17923785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental study on embolization of rabbit renal artery with gelatin sponge microspheres.
Zhao X; Wang Z; Zhao G; Zhang Y; Ji M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1617-1624. PubMed ID: 33565508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gelatin microspheres: correlation between embolic effect/degradability and cross-linkage/particle size.
Ohta S; Nitta N; Watanabe S; Tomozawa Y; Sonoda A; Otani H; Tsuchiya K; Nitta-Seko A; Yamamoto A; Takahashi M; Murata K
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):1105-11. PubMed ID: 23238849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Looking for the ideal particle: an experimental embolization study.
Senturk C; Cakir V; Yorukoglu K; Yilmaz O; Goktay AY
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):336-45. PubMed ID: 19915900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the embolic effect and degradability of gelatin microspheres and Gelpart particles.
Nitta N; Ohta S; Sonoda A; Watanabe S; Otani H; Tomozawa Y; Nitta-Seko A; Tsuchiya K; Mukaisho K; Takahashi M; Murata K; Tabata Y
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2013 Jun; 22(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 22928885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of Calibrated Gelatin Sponge Particles in a Rabbit Renal Embolization Model.
Ye Y; Ren Y; Zeng H; He J; Zhong Z; Wu X
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2019 Aug; 42(8):1183-1191. PubMed ID: 31044293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chitin-based embolic materials in the renal artery of rabbits: pathologic evaluation of an absorbable particulate agent.
Kwak BK; Shim HJ; Han SM; Park ES
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 15987971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Embolic effects of superabsorbent polymer microspheres in rabbit renal model: comparison with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres and polyvinyl alcohol.
Khankan AA; Osuga K; Hori S; Morii E; Murakami T; Nakamura H
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):384-90. PubMed ID: 15648453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental evaluation of early and long-term effects of microparticle embolization in two different mini-pig models. Part I: kidney.
Stampfl S; Stampfl U; Rehnitz C; Schnabel P; Satzl S; Christoph P; Henn C; Thomas F; Kauffmann GW; Richter GM
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 17216380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathologic evaluation of a spherical polyvinyl alcohol embolic agent in a porcine renal model.
Siskin GP; Dowling K; Virmani R; Jones R; Todd D
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 12525592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Water-Based Liquid Embolic: Evaluation of its Safety and Efficacy in a Rabbit Kidney Model.
Ganguli S; Lareau R; Jarrett T; Soulen MC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):813-818. PubMed ID: 33677119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of tris-acryl gelatin microsphere embolization with monochromatic X Rays: comparison with polyvinyl alcohol particles.
Yamamoto A; Imai S; Kobatake M; Yamashita T; Tamada T; Umetani K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Nov; 17(11 Pt 1):1797-802. PubMed ID: 17142710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeting and recanalization after embolization with calibrated resorbable microspheres versus hand-cut gelatin sponge particles in a porcine kidney model.
Maeda N; Verret V; Moine L; Bédouet L; Louguet S; Servais E; Osuga K; Tomiyama N; Wassef M; Laurent A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23891049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gelatin microspheres: initial clinical experience for the transcatheter arterial embolization.
Nitta N; Ohta S; Tanaka T; Takazakura R; Nagatani Y; Kono N; Sonoda A; Seko A; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K; Tabata Y
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 17826023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biocompatibility and recanalization characteristics of hydrogel microspheres with polyzene-F as polymer coating.
Stampfl S; Stampfl U; Bellemann N; Sommer CM; Thierjung H; Radeleff B; Lopez-Benitez R; Berger I; Kauffmann GW; Richter GM
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 18214594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of endovascular embolization with a collagen-based embolic agent (Marsembol) in an animal model.
Vidal V; Rolland PH; Daniel L; Moulin G; Bartoli JM; Levrier O
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 20685135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibrated bioresorbable microspheres: a preliminary study on the level of occlusion and arterial distribution in a rabbit kidney model.
Weng L; Rusten M; Talaie R; Hairani M; Rosener NK; Golzarian J
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1567-75. PubMed ID: 23928298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Efficacy of experimental renal embolization with microspheres. Additionally, a critical report on the complication rate of intra-arterial embolization with particles (author's transl)].
Bischoff W; Rohrbach R; Kauffmann G; Wenzel G; Klose D
Urol Int; 1977; 32(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 929776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Uterine Necrosis After Uterine Artery Embolization with Soluble Gelatin Sponge Particles or Tris-acryl Gelatin Microspheres in Swine.
Sato H; Sonomura T; Onishi S; Koike M; Tanaka R; Ueda S; Okuhira R; Kamisako A; Koyama T; Shima N; Yamamoto S; Sakai Y; Murata SI; Ikoma A
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2021 Nov; 44(11):1780-1789. PubMed ID: 34231005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
