These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680471)

  • 1. Interactive fitting of multiple algorithms implemented in the same digital hearing aid.
    Franck BA; Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jul; 46(7):388-97. PubMed ID: 17680471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The progress of algorithms applied in digital hearing aid].
    Xiao X; Wang N; Hu G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 21(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 15357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of single-channel phonemic compression schemes on the understanding of speech by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Goedegebure A; Hulshof M; Maas RJ; Dreschler WA; Verschuure H
    Audiology; 2001; 40(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 11296937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.
    Luts H; Eneman K; Wouters J; Schulte M; Vormann M; Buechler M; Dillier N; Houben R; Dreschler WA; Froehlich M; Puder H; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Leijon A; Lombard A; Mauler D; Spriet A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
    Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Improvement of hearing aid fitting with digital aids and new fitting strategies].
    Schorn K; Baumann U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jan; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10080122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strengths and weaknesses of procedures for separating simultaneous voices.
    Summerfield Q; Stubbs RJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():91-100. PubMed ID: 2356742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive feedback stabilization of hearing aids.
    Engebretson AM; French-St George M; O'Connell MP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():56-64. PubMed ID: 8153565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of digital technology on the selection and fitting of hearing aids.
    Hecox KE; Punch JL
    Am J Otol; 1988 Dec; 9 Suppl():77-85. PubMed ID: 3059815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological aspects of an adaptive multidirectional pattern search to optimize speech perception using three hearing-aid algorithms.
    Franck BA; Dreschler WA; Lyzenga J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3620-8. PubMed ID: 15658712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.