These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680471)

  • 21. Evaluation of adaptive multimicrophone algorithms for hearing aids.
    Chazan D; Medan Y; Shvadron U
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 3430370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
    Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss.
    Ricketts TA; Dittberner AB; Johnson EE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 18230863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Dreschler WA; Verschuure H; Ludvigsen C; Westermann S
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):148-57. PubMed ID: 11465297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech.
    Ludvigsen C; Elberling C; Keidser G; Poulsen T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():190-5. PubMed ID: 2356726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of envelope discontinuities on perceptual restoration of amplitude-compressed speech.
    Başkent D; Eiler C; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3995-4005. PubMed ID: 19507981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The status of hearing aid technology from the audiologic viewpoint].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 1988 Sep; 36(9):377-82. PubMed ID: 3049479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems.
    Srinivasan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of a hearing aid noise reduction algorithm on the acquisition of novel speech contrasts.
    Marcoux AM; Yathiraj A; Côté I; Logan J
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):707-14. PubMed ID: 17132559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toward a theory of optimal hearing aid processing.
    Kates JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 8263828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of dynamic compression on directional hearing in the horizontal plane.
    Musa-Shufani S; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 16672796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Real-time signal processing in speech recognition and its potential use within the development of hearing aids.
    Dalsgaard P; Fink FK; Pedersen JE; Sørensen H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():108-16. PubMed ID: 2356718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.