BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680833)

  • 1. Estimating the intensity of a spatial point process from locations coarsened by incomplete geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):262-70. PubMed ID: 17680833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial clustering of the failure to geocode and its implications for the detection of disease clustering.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4254-66. PubMed ID: 18407570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
    Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
    Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
    Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial error in geocoding physician location data from the AMA Physician Masterfile: implications for spatial accessibility analysis.
    McLafferty S; Freeman VL; Barrett RE; Luo L; Shockley A
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22469489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
    Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of residential geocoding methods in population-based study of air quality and birth defects.
    Gilboa SM; Mendola P; Olshan AF; Harness C; Loomis D; Langlois PH; Savitz DA; Herring AH
    Environ Res; 2006 Jun; 101(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16483563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood methods for regression models with expensive variables missing by design.
    Zhao Y; Lawless JF; McLeish DL
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19197954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generalized additive models for cancer mapping with incomplete covariates.
    French JL; Wand MP
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):177-91. PubMed ID: 15054024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey.
    Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA;
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post office box addresses: a challenge for geographic information system-based studies.
    Hurley SE; Saunders TM; Nivas R; Hertz A; Reynolds P
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 12843760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference based on kernel estimates of the relative risk function in geographical epidemiology.
    Hazelton ML; Davies TM
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 19197958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A latent-class mixture model for incomplete longitudinal Gaussian data.
    Beunckens C; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G; Mallinckrodt C
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 17608789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of matched case-control data in presence of nonignorable missing exposure.
    Sinha S; Maiti T
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 17573865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research.
    Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.