173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680833)
21. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility.
Bell S; Wilson K; Shah TI; Gersher S; Elliott T
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 22469488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of local street network characteristics on the positional accuracy of automated geocoding for geographic health studies.
Zimmerman DL; Li J
Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 20158886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A note on the use of unbiased estimating equations to estimate correlation in analysis of longitudinal trials.
Sun W; Shults J; Leonard M
Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 19197953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
Roy S; Banerjee T
Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A multilevel model for continuous time population estimation.
Sutherland JM; Castelluccio P; Schwarz CJ
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):841-9. PubMed ID: 19173692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Regression analysis of panel count data with dependent observation times.
Sun J; Tong X; He X
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 18078478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated geospatial conflation of vector road maps to high resolution imagery.
Song W; Keller JM; Haithcoat TL; Davis CH
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Feb; 18(2):388-400. PubMed ID: 19095535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Second-order analysis of inhomogeneous spatial point processes using case-control data.
Diggle PJ; Gómez-Rubio V; Brown PE; Chetwynd AG; Gooding S
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):550-7. PubMed ID: 17688507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Geocoding in cancer research: a review.
Rushton G; Armstrong MP; Gittler J; Greene BR; Pavlik CE; West MM; Zimmerman DL
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 30(2 Suppl):S16-24. PubMed ID: 16458786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Isotonized CDF estimation from judgment poststratification data with empty strata.
Wang X; Wang K; Lim J
Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 21838805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
