These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17680863)

  • 1. Comparison and correlation between stinging responses to lactic acid and bioengineering parameters.
    An S; Lee E; Kim S; Nam G; Lee H; Moon S; Chang I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Sep; 57(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 17680863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin sensitivity evaluation: What could impact the assessment results?
    Ye C; Chen J; Yang S; Yi J; Chen H; Li M; Yin S; Lai W; Zheng Y
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 May; 19(5):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 31498557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between stinging, TEWL and capacitance.
    Wu Y; Wang X; Zhou Y; Tan Y; Chen D; Chen Y; Ye M
    Skin Res Technol; 2003 May; 9(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 12709125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin.
    Seidenari S; Francomano M; Mantovani L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Jun; 38(6):311-5. PubMed ID: 9687028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Susceptibility to skin stinging, non-immunologic contact urticaria and acute skin irritation; is there a relationship?
    Coverly J; Peters L; Whittle E; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Feb; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 9506221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seasonal variability in the biophysical properties of forehead skin in women in Guangzhou City, China.
    Wan MJ; Su XY; Zheng Y; Gong ZJ; Yi JL; Zhao Y; Guan XM; Lai W
    Int J Dermatol; 2015 Nov; 54(11):1319-24. PubMed ID: 25557023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cross-sectional study of variations in the biophysical parameters of skin among healthy volunteers.
    Mehta HH; Nikam VV; Jaiswal CR; Mehta HB
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2018; 84(4):521. PubMed ID: 29491191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seasonal variations of epidermal biophysical properties in Kunming, China: A self-controlled cohort study.
    Yang J; Tu Y; Man MQ; Zhang Y; Cha Y; Fan X; Wang Z; Zeng Z; He L
    Skin Res Technol; 2020 Sep; 26(5):702-707. PubMed ID: 32196767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women.
    Aramaki J; Kawana S; Effendy I; Happle R; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2002 Jun; 146(6):1052-6. PubMed ID: 12072076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin physiology in men and women: in vivo evaluation of 300 people including TEWL, SC hydration, sebum content and skin surface pH.
    Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2013 Oct; 35(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 23713991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of oxybrasion on selected skin parameters.
    Jarząbek S; Rotsztejn H
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Feb; 20(2):657-663. PubMed ID: 32573038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping the human face: biophysical properties.
    Wa CV; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):38-54. PubMed ID: 20384882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitive skin is highly frequent in extrinsic atopic dermatitis and correlates with disease severity markers but not necessarily with skin barrier impairment.
    Yatagai T; Shimauchi T; Yamaguchi H; Sakabe JI; Aoshima M; Ikeya S; Tatsuno K; Fujiyama T; Ito T; Ojima T; Tokura Y
    J Dermatol Sci; 2018 Jan; 89(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 29122406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of water exposure on biophysical properties of normal skin.
    Firooz A; Aghazadeh N; Rajabi Estarabadi A; Hejazi P
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 25066831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between lactic acid sting test scores, self-assessed sensitive skin scores and biophysical properties in Chinese females.
    Ding DM; Tu Y; Man MQ; Wu WJ; Lu FY; Li X; Li Y; Yang JT; Jin YM; Yang CY; He L
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2019 Aug; 41(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 31194883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noxious sensory perceptions in patients with mild to moderate rosacea treated with azelaic acid 15% gel.
    Draelos ZD
    Cutis; 2004 Oct; 74(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 15551720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two series of non-invasive instruments used for the skin physiological properties measurements: the DermaLab
    Hua W; Fan LM; Dai R; Luan M; Xie H; Li AQ; Li L
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 Feb; 23(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 27637867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the effects of 10% and 30% gluconolactone chemical peel on sebum, pH, and TEWL.
    Jarząbek-Perz S; Dziedzic M; Rotsztejn H; Kołodziejczak A
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Dec; 22(12):3305-3312. PubMed ID: 37335807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questionnaire and Lactic Acid Sting Test Play Different Role on the Assessment of Sensitive Skin: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Pan Y; Ma X; Song Y; Zhao J; Yan S
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 2021; 14():1215-1225. PubMed ID: 34548802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biophysical parameters of skin: map of human face, regional, and age-related differences.
    Marrakchi S; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jul; 57(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 17577354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.