BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

767 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17681781)

  • 1. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Lord SJ; Lei W; Craft P; Cawson JN; Morris I; Walleser S; Griffiths A; Parker S; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Sep; 43(13):1905-17. PubMed ID: 17681781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
    Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
    JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.
    Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer.
    Le-Petross HT; Whitman GJ; Atchley DP; Yuan Y; Gutierrez-Barrera A; Hortobagyi GN; Litton JK; Arun BK
    Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(17):3900-7. PubMed ID: 21365619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI in the early detection of breast cancer in women with high genetic risk.
    Trecate G; Vergnaghi D; Manoukian S; Bergonzi S; Scaperrotta G; Marchesini M; Ferranti C; Peissel B; Spatti G; Bohm S; Conti A; Costa C; Sporeni M; Podo F; Musumeci R
    Tumori; 2006; 92(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 17260493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.
    Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Leutner CC; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Wardelmann E; Fimmers R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8469-76. PubMed ID: 16293877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Warner E; Messersmith H; Causer P; Eisen A; Shumak R; Plewes D
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 May; 148(9):671-9. PubMed ID: 18458280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.
    Riedl CC; Luft N; Bernhart C; Weber M; Bernathova M; Tea MK; Rudas M; Singer CF; Helbich TH
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1128-35. PubMed ID: 25713430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
    Berg WA; Zhang Z; Lehrer D; Jong RA; Pisano ED; Barr RG; Böhm-Vélez M; Mahoney MC; Evans WP; Larsen LH; Morton MJ; Mendelson EB; Farria DM; Cormack JB; Marques HS; Adams A; Yeh NM; Gabrielli G;
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(13):1394-404. PubMed ID: 22474203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).
    Leach MO; Boggis CR; Dixon AK; Easton DF; Eeles RA; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Griebsch I; Hoff RJ; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Thompson D; Warren RM;
    Lancet; 2005 May 21-27; 365(9473):1769-78. PubMed ID: 15910949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk.
    Podo F; Sardanelli F; Canese R; D'Agnolo G; Natali PG; Crecco M; Grandinetti ML; Musumeci R; Trecate G; Bergonzi S; De Simone T; Costa C; Pasini B; Manuokian S; Spatti GB; Vergnaghi D; Morassut S; Boiocchi M; Dolcetti R; Viel A; De Giacomi C; Veronesi A; Coran F; Silingardi V; Turchett D; Cortesi L; De Santis M; Federico M; Romagnoli R; Ferrari S; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C; Caligo MA; Cilotti A; Marini C; Cirillo S; Marra V; Martincich L; Contegiacomo A; Pensabene M; Capuano I; Burgazzi GB; Petrillo A; Bonomo L; Carriero A; Mariani-Costantini R; Battista P; Cama A; Palca G; Di Maggio C; D'Andrea E; Bazzocchi M; Francescutti GE; Zuiani C; Londero V; Zunnui I; Gustavino C; Centurioni MG; Iozzelli A; Panizza P; Del Maschio A
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):115-24. PubMed ID: 12585665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
    Fakkert IE; Jansen L; Meijer K; Kok T; Oosterwijk JC; Mourits MJ; de Bock GH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 129(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 21373873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.
    Warner E; Plewes DB; Shumak RS; Catzavelos GC; Di Prospero LS; Yaffe MJ; Goel V; Ramsay E; Chart PL; Cole DE; Taylor GA; Cutrara M; Samuels TH; Murphy JP; Murphy JM; Narod SA
    J Clin Oncol; 2001 Aug; 19(15):3524-31. PubMed ID: 11481359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.
    Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.