These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17681964)
1. A large-scale multicentre study in Belgium of dose area product values and effective doses in interventional cardiology using contemporary X-ray equipment. Bogaert E; Bacher K; Thierens H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 17681964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of the correlation between dose area product and effective dose in vascular radiology. Smans K; Struelens L; Hoornaert MT; Bleeser F; Buls N; Berus D; Clerinx P; Malchair F; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 18310610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Bacher K; Bogaert E; Lapere R; De Wolf D; Thierens H Circulation; 2005 Jan; 111(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15611374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Conversion coefficients for estimation of effective dose to patients from dose area product during fluoroscopy x-ray examinations]. Gosch D; Gosch K; Kahn T Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1035-42. PubMed ID: 17879174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory. Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses. Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference levels in PTCA as a function of procedure complexity. Peterzol A; Quai E; Padovani R; Bernardi G; Kotre CJ; Dowling A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):54-8. PubMed ID: 16461527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient and staff doses in interventional X-ray procedures in Sweden. Persliden J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):150-7. PubMed ID: 15933098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose conversion coefficients calculated using tomographic phantom, KTMAN-2, for X-ray examination of cardiac catheterisation. Park SH; Lee JK; Lee C Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17766255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interventional cardiovascular procedures in Belgium: effective dose and conversion factors. Bogaert E; Bacher K; Thierens H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):77-82. PubMed ID: 18385181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]