These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17682936)

  • 1. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
    Li NP; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):468-89. PubMed ID: 16594832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: sex and attractiveness effects.
    van Straaten I; Holland RW; Finkenauer C; Hollenstein T; Engels RC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19263209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex-similar preferences for a short-term mate.
    Shackelford TK; Goetz AT; LaMunyon CW; Quintus BJ; Weekes-Shackelford VA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2004 Aug; 33(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 15162086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Actual and desired duration of foreplay and intercourse: discordance and misperceptions within heterosexual couples.
    Miller SA; Byers ES
    J Sex Res; 2004 Aug; 41(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 15497058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle.
    Haselton MG; Gangestad SW
    Horm Behav; 2006 Apr; 49(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16403409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women.
    Ha T; van den Berg JE; Engels RC; Lichtwarck-Aschoff A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 21979410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.
    Pashos A; Niemitz C
    Anthropol Anz; 2003 Sep; 61(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 14524006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early psychosocial stress affects men's relationship length.
    Koehler N; Chisholm JS
    J Sex Res; 2009; 46(4):366-74. PubMed ID: 19253135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual insistence and disliked sexual activities in young adulthood: differences by gender and relationship characteristics.
    Elizabeth Kaestle C
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Mar; 41(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19291127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive representations of sexual self differ as a function of gender and sexual debut.
    Lindgren KP; Schacht RL; Mullins PM; Blayney JA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 19757009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in post-coital behaviors in long- and short-term mating: an evolutionary perspective.
    Hughes SM; Kruger DJ
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 20799133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.
    Eastwick PW; Eagly AH; Finkel EJ; Johnson SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):993-1011. PubMed ID: 21767032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reported sexual desire predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic cues in women's faces.
    Jones BC; Little AC; Watkins CD; Welling LL; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1281-5. PubMed ID: 21213032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive ambition predicts partnered, but not unpartnered, women's preferences for masculine men.
    Watkins CD
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 103(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 22804699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.