236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17683227)
1. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
Lamy D; Yashar A
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
Wykowska A; Schubö A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
Dalton P; Lavie N
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods.
Turatto M; Galfano G; Gardini S; Mascetti GG
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):297-324. PubMed ID: 14742178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The stage of priming: are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional?
Becker SI
Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(5):664-84. PubMed ID: 18226831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
Burnham BR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming.
Becker SI
Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2116-26. PubMed ID: 20691720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.
Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T
Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional capture by a salient distractor in visual search: the effect of target-distractor similarity.
Poiese P; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 19071990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
Inukai T; Kawahara J; Kumada T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search.
Lamy D; Bar-Anan Y; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):268-85. PubMed ID: 18377170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
Lamy D; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attentional effects of negative faces: top-down contingent or involuntary?
Horstmann G; Becker SI
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1416-34. PubMed ID: 19064487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
