BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17683235)

  • 1. The role of active exploration of 3D face stimuli on recognition memory of facial information.
    Liu CH; Ward J; Markall H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):895-904. PubMed ID: 17683235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of 3D information in face recognition.
    Liu CH; Ward J
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):768-73. PubMed ID: 16298412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of perceptual history on memory of visual objects.
    Preminger S; Sagi D; Tsodyks M
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):965-73. PubMed ID: 17300824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information.
    Caharel S; Jiang F; Blanz V; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1809-18. PubMed ID: 19497375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced visual short-term memory for angry faces.
    Jackson MC; Wu CY; Linden DE; Raymond JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19331494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces.
    Burke D; Taubert J; Higman T
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2164-9. PubMed ID: 17572467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.
    Busey TA; Arici A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1123-36. PubMed ID: 19686009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding deficit during face processing within the right fusiform face area in schizophrenia.
    Walther S; Federspiel A; Horn H; Bianchi P; Wiest R; Wirth M; Strik W; Müller TJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Jun; 172(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 19398309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles.
    Vuong QC; Peissig JJ; Harrison MC; Tarr MJ
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1213-23. PubMed ID: 15733955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of 3D representations in face recognition.
    Schwaninger A; Yang J
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(9):969-77. PubMed ID: 21324334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiar face and voice matching and recognition in children with autism.
    Boucher J; Lewis V; Collis G
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1998 Feb; 39(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 9669230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neuroanatomic basis of facial perception and variable facial discrimination ability: implications for orthodontics.
    Masella RS; Meister M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 17826596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.
    Brady N; Campbell M; Flaherty M
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15963384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer between pose and expression training in face recognition.
    Chen W; Liu CH
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 19056417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of impaired facial affect recognition with basic facial and visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.
    Norton D; McBain R; Holt DJ; Ongur D; Chen Y
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 65(12):1094-8. PubMed ID: 19268917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-learning intranasal oxytocin modulates human memory for facial identity.
    Savaskan E; Ehrhardt R; Schulz A; Walter M; Schächinger H
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2008 Apr; 33(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 18221838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.