These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17683615)

  • 1. SNPs in Multi-species Conserved Sequences (MCS) as useful markers in association studies: a practical approach.
    McCauley JL; Kenealy SJ; Margulies EH; Schnetz-Boutaud N; Gregory SG; Hauser SL; Oksenberg JR; Pericak-Vance MA; Haines JL; Mortlock DP
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():266. PubMed ID: 17683615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follow-up examination of linkage and association to chromosome 1q43 in multiple sclerosis.
    McCauley JL; Zuvich RL; Bradford Y; Kenealy SJ; Schnetz-Boutaud N; Gregory SG; Hauser SL; Oksenberg JR; Mortlock DP; Pericak-Vance MA; Haines JL
    Genes Immun; 2009 Oct; 10(7):624-30. PubMed ID: 19626040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linkage mapping bovine EST-based SNP.
    Snelling WM; Casas E; Stone RT; Keele JW; Harhay GP; Bennett GL; Smith TP
    BMC Genomics; 2005 May; 6():74. PubMed ID: 15943875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selecting SNPs for association studies based on population frequencies: a novel interactive tool and its application to polygenic diseases.
    Möller S; Koczan D; Serrano-Fernandez P; Zettl UK; Thiesen HJ; Ibrahim SM
    In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 15506992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cis-regulatory variations: a study of SNPs around genes showing cis-linkage in segregating mouse populations.
    GuhaThakurta D; Xie T; Anand M; Edwards SW; Li G; Wang SS; Schadt EE
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Sep; 7():235. PubMed ID: 16978413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genome scan linkage analysis comparing microsatellites and single-nucleotide polymorphisms markers for two measures of alcoholism in chromosomes 1, 4, and 7.
    Chen G; Adeyemo A; Zhou J; Yuan A; Chen Y; Rotimi C
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 16451650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power-based, phase-informed selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for disease association screens.
    Saccone SF; Rice JP; Saccone NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 16685721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From genetic associations to functional studies in multiple sclerosis.
    Bos SD; Berge T; Celius EG; Harbo HF
    Eur J Neurol; 2016 May; 23(5):847-53. PubMed ID: 26948534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linkage disequilibrium analyses within chromosome 19p in multiple sclerosis.
    Vyshkina T; Kalman B
    Mult Scler; 2008 May; 14(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 18208878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of intronic conserved elements indicates that functional complexity might represent a major source of negative selection on non-coding sequences.
    Sironi M; Menozzi G; Comi GP; Cagliani R; Bresolin N; Pozzoli U
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Sep; 14(17):2533-46. PubMed ID: 16037065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haplotype-based approach to known MS-associated regions increases the amount of explained risk.
    Khankhanian P; Gourraud PA; Lizee A; Goodin DS
    J Med Genet; 2015 Sep; 52(9):587-94. PubMed ID: 26185143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic variants of Complex I in multiple sclerosis.
    Vyshkina T; Banisor I; Shugart YY; Leist TP; Kalman B
    J Neurol Sci; 2005 Jan; 228(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15607211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LDGIdb: a database of gene interactions inferred from long-range strong linkage disequilibrium between pairs of SNPs.
    Wang MC; Chen FC; Chen YZ; Huang YT; Chuang TJ
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 May; 5():212. PubMed ID: 22551073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritize and select SNPs for association studies with multi-stage designs.
    Li J
    J Comput Biol; 2008 Apr; 15(3):241-57. PubMed ID: 18352819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Snat: a SNP annotation tool for bovine by integrating various sources of genomic information.
    Jiang J; Jiang L; Zhou B; Fu W; Liu JF; Zhang Q
    BMC Genet; 2011 Oct; 12():85. PubMed ID: 21982513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SNPselector: a web tool for selecting SNPs for genetic association studies.
    Xu H; Gregory SG; Hauser ER; Stenger JE; Pericak-Vance MA; Vance JM; Züchner S; Hauser MA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4181-6. PubMed ID: 16179360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An extended genome scan in 442 Canadian multiple sclerosis-affected sibships: a report from the Canadian Collaborative Study Group.
    Dyment DA; Sadovnick AD; Willer CJ; Armstrong H; Cader ZM; Wiltshire S; Kalman B; Risch N; Ebers GC;
    Hum Mol Genet; 2004 May; 13(10):1005-15. PubMed ID: 15069025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.