These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1768432)

  • 21. Establishment and evaluation of immortalized human epidermal keratinocytes for an alternative skin irritation test.
    Kim CW; Kim CD; Choi KC
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017; 88(Pt 2):130-139. PubMed ID: 28827132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.
    Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Irritation test of tissue adhesives for facial prostheses.
    Dahl JE; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 11044854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A rapid cell culture technique for assessing the toxicity of detergent-based products in vitro as a possible screen for eye irritancy in vivo.
    Kemp RB; Meredith RW; Gamble S; Frost M
    Cytobios; 1983; 36(143-44):153-9. PubMed ID: 6851660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ability of in vitro (corneal injury--eye organ--and chorioallantoic membrane) tests to represent histopathological features of acute eye inflammation.
    Parish WE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 3874130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MTT-assay and neutral red release (NRR)-assay: relative role in the prediction of the irritancy potential of surfactants.
    Korting HC; Schindler S; Hartinger A; Kerscher M; Angerpointner T; Maibach HI
    Life Sci; 1994; 55(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 8041231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A critical evaluation of predicting ocular irritancy potential from an in vitro cytotoxicity assay.
    Kennah HE; Albulescu D; Hignet S; Barrow CS
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1989 Feb; 12(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 2714528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests.
    Wilhelm KP; Böttjer B; Siegers CP
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye irritation potential: palm-based methyl ester sulphonates.
    Yusof NZ; Azizul Hasan ZA; Abd Maurad Z; Idris Z
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Jun; 37(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 28693384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro quantitative determination of ophthalmic irritancy by the chorioallantoic membrane test with trypan blue staining as alternative to eye irritation test.
    Lagarto A; Vega R; Guerra I; González R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Aug; 20(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 16309878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Irritative effects of some pesticides and a technical component on tissue structure of the chorioallantoic membrane.
    Budai P; Várnagy L; Fejes S; Somlyay IM; Linczmayer K; Pongrácz A
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2004; 69(4):807-9. PubMed ID: 15756873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of seven in vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing.
    Bruner LH; Kain DJ; Roberts DA; Parker RD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Jul; 17(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 1916072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential.
    Luepke NP
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 4040077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and intralaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments.
    Osborne R; Perkins MA; Roberts DA
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Nov; 28(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 8566478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The chorioallantoic membrane in irritation testing.
    Lawrence RS; Groom MH; Ackroyd DM; Parish WE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1986; 24(6-7):497-502. PubMed ID: 3781410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel approach to the search for in vitro alternatives to in vivo eye irritancy testing.
    Muir CK; Flower C; Van Abbé NJ
    Toxicol Lett; 1983 Aug; 18(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 6623530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of cytotoxicity in vitro and irritation in vivo for aqueous and oily solutions of surfactants.
    Czajkowska-Kośnik A; Wolska E; Chorążewicz J; Sznitowska M
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2015; 41(8):1232-6. PubMed ID: 25019499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A compartment model to calculate time-dependent concentration profiles of topically applied chemical compounds in the anterior compartments of the rabbit eye.
    Pospisil H; Holzhütter HG
    Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11387029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Studies on eye irritation caused by chemicals in rabbits--II. An in vitro testing method using rat red blood cells for the prediction of eye irritation potential of chemicals.
    Sugai S; Murata K; Kitagaki T; Tomita I
    J Toxicol Sci; 1991 Aug; 16(3):131-44. PubMed ID: 1942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prevalidation study on the in vitro skin irritation function test (SIFT) for prediction of acute skin irritation in vivo: results and evaluation of ECVAM Phase III.
    Heylings JR; Diot S; Esdaile DJ; Fasano WJ; Manning LA; Owen HM
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2003 Apr; 17(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 12650665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.