These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17684663)

  • 1. Selective attention: psi performance in children with learning disabilities.
    Garcia VL; Pereira LD; Fukuda Y
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 73(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 17684663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of distorted speech in children with and without learning problems.
    Bornstein SP; Musiek FE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jan; 3(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 1571582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dichotic listening tests in students with learning disabilities.
    Pinheiro FH; Oliveira AM; Cardoso AC; Capellini SA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 20549089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study on the application of the time-compressed speech in children.
    Padilha FYOMM; Pinheiro MMC
    Codas; 2017 Nov; 29(5):e20160239. PubMed ID: 29160335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Users Compared With Cochlear Implant Users With Additional Disabilities.
    van der Straaten TFK; Netten AP; Boermans PPBM; Briaire JJ; Scholing E; Koot RW; Malessy MJA; van der Mey AGL; Verbist BM; Frijns JHM
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):936-945. PubMed ID: 31295204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pediatric speech intelligibility test: performance-intensity characteristics.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 7152156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Auditory processing maturation in children with and without learning difficulties].
    Ivone FN; Schochat E
    Pro Fono; 2005; 17(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 16389788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-compressed speech test in the elderly.
    Arceno RS; Scharlach RC
    Codas; 2017 Sep; 29(5):e20160243. PubMed ID: 28977058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech discrimination in children: auditory and auditory/visual processing with binaural and monaural presentation.
    Yonovitz A; Dickenson P; Miller D; Spydell J
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 511664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception and production in children with inner ear malformations after cochlear implantation.
    Rachovitsas D; Psillas G; Chatzigiannakidou V; Triaridis S; Constantinidis J; Vital V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1370-4. PubMed ID: 22776809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech audiometry in the young child.
    Jerger S; Jerger J; Abrams S
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 6832508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Audiologic diagnosis in children. Applicability of different speech material].
    Feldhusen F; Möhring L; Brunner M; Troost J; Spielberger C; Braun-Frank L; Schoenfelder D; Pröschel U
    HNO; 2004 Feb; 52(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 14968321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cleft palate children: performance in auditory processing tests.
    Boscariol M; André KD; Feniman MR
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19575106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of the Continuous Number Identification Test (CNIT): feasibility of dynamic assessment of speech intelligibility.
    Ozmeral EJ; Hoover EC; Gabbidon P; Eddins DA
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):434-442. PubMed ID: 32003257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of central auditory processing on the intelligibility of the speech in the patients presenting with hearing impairment].
    Boboshko MY; Berdnikova IP; Garbaruk ES; Salakhbekov MA; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2018; 83(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 29697645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practice effects of a four-talker babble on the synthetic sentence identification test.
    Beattie RC; Clark N
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 7117716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the pediatric speech intelligibility test in children with central nervous system lesions.
    Jerger S
    Audiology; 1987; 26(5):298-311. PubMed ID: 3675313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedure learning effects in speech perception tests.
    Theodoridis GC; Schoeny ZG
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 2222292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.