241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17685251)
21. Accuracy of a preoperative model for predicting invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ on vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy.
Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Marinovich ML; Bianchi S; Macaskill P; Vezzosi V; Mamounas EP; Ciatto S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1364-71. PubMed ID: 21107741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Invasive lobular carcinoma in a patient with synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ: detection with MR imaging.
Cooney BS; Orel SG; Schnall MD; Troupin RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1318-20. PubMed ID: 8191990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Histological assessment of breast lesions identified exclusively by magnetic resonance.
O'Connor V; Arena E; Albright J; Brown N; O'Connor R; Chung M; DiNome M; Shamonki J
Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):944-7. PubMed ID: 25264635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Overview of breast cancer.
Watkins EJ
JAAPA; 2019 Oct; 32(10):13-17. PubMed ID: 31513033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Apocrine Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Presenting as a Large, Cystic Breast Mass: An Uncommon Presentation of a Rare Breast Lesion.
Seo KJ; Whang IY
Breast J; 2017 Sep; 23(5):594-595. PubMed ID: 28252232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Our experience in the management and long term clinical follow-up in 71 patients.
Latronico A; Nicosia L; Faggian A; Abbate F; Penco S; Bozzini A; Cannataci C; Mazzarol G; Cassano E
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():1-5. PubMed ID: 29032282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR imaging of the skin and nipple of the breast: differentiation between tumour recurrence and post-treatment change.
Ralleigh G; Walker AE; Hall-Craggs MA; Lakhani SR; Saunders C
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 11511886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CD133 expressionand clinicopathologic significance in benign and malignant breast lesions.
Liu TT; Li XF; Wang L; Yang JL
Cancer Biomark; 2020; 28(3):293-299. PubMed ID: 32390595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Invasive Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In-situ in Patients with Lobular Neoplasia on Core Biopsy: Results from a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry (TBCRC 020).
Nakhlis F; Gilmore L; Gelman R; Bedrosian I; Ludwig K; Hwang ES; Willey S; Hudis C; Iglehart JD; Lawler E; Ryabin NY; Golshan M; Schnitt SJ; King TA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):722-8. PubMed ID: 26542585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast procedures guided by magnetic resonance imaging.
David J; Trop I; Lalonde L
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Dec; 56(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 16579025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast Cancer following Augmentation Mammaplasty: A Case-Control Study.
Sosin M; Devulapalli C; Fehring C; Hammond ER; Willey SC; Tousimis EA; Spear SL; Nahabedian MY; Feldman ED
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 29595718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Magnetic resonance mammography--open questions].
Kessler M; Sittek H; Reiser M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M107-15. PubMed ID: 8974887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rates of pathological underestimation for 9 and 12 gauge breast needle core biopsies at surgical excision.
Destounis S; Skolny MN; Morgan R; Arieno A; Murphy PF; Somerville P; Seifert P; Young W
Breast Cancer; 2011 Jan; 18(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 20204553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Not all ductal carcinoma in situ is created equal: can we avoid surgery for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?
Lippey J; Spillane A; Saunders C
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Nov; 86(11):859-860. PubMed ID: 27784140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
