These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17685780)

  • 1. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation.
    Chew MT; Sandham A; Soh J; Wong HB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17685780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective evaluation of the accuracy of video imaging prediction following orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients.
    Chew MT; Koh CH; Sandham A; Wong HB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18201611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the facial soft-tissue profile after mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Rudzki I; Mast G; Holberg C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 30173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in the facial soft tissue profile after maxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Krennmair S; Holberg S; Holberg C; Mast G; Rudzki I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):215-220. PubMed ID: 33881549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients.
    Raschke GF; Rieger UM; Bader RD; Guentsch A; Schaefer O; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 22893037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The frontal soft tissue changes in the lower facial portion after orthodontic treatment combined with anterior segmental osteotomy.
    Cha YM; Park NS; Bayome M; Han SH; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 22022694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.
    Klaus K; Heumann C; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Nov; 78(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 28660422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis.
    Bergman RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):373-89. PubMed ID: 10511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.
    Tan SK; Leung WK; Tang ATH; Zwahlen RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):e105-e113. PubMed ID: 34531091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.
    Kinzinger G; Frye L; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):63-91. PubMed ID: 19194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles.
    Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
    Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.