These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17685784)
21. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features. Chen Z Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation. Brockmole JR; Boot WR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Grubert A; Krummenacher J; Eimer M J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients. Osugi T; Kawahara JI Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search. Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21491164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Which search are you on? Adapting to color while searching for shape. Bergmann N; Tünnermann J; Schubö A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):457-477. PubMed ID: 31741316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Permeability of priming of pop out to expectations. Pascucci D; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search. Schubö A; Müller HJ Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Emotional priming of pop-out in visual search. Lamy D; Amunts L; Bar-Haim Y Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 18410189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of motor response in implicit encoding: evidence from intertrial priming in pop-out search. Yashar A; Makovski T; Lamy D Vision Res; 2013 Dec; 93():80-7. PubMed ID: 24400358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target. Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. Belopolsky AV; Awh E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 26348067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spatiotemporal object history affects the selection of task-relevant properties. Schreij D; Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):216-32. PubMed ID: 22390295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]