These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
31. Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies. Caulfield T; Cook-Deegan RM; Kieff FS; Walsh JP Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1091-4. PubMed ID: 16964215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Patent pools and standard setting in diagnostic genetics. Ebersole TJ; Guthrie MC; Goldstein JA Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):937-8. PubMed ID: 16082359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Patent protection and access to genetic resources. Shimbo I; Ito Y; Sumikura K Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jun; 26(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 18536683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Federal judge and government of the United States against gene patenting]. Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D Med Sci (Paris); 2011; 27(6-7):662-6. PubMed ID: 21718652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies. Merges RP MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive. Van Overwalle G Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):187-203. PubMed ID: 15032104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The importance of getting inventorship right. Sheiness D; Canady K Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16465154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Why the European Parliament rejected the patenting of human genes. Grace M Gene Ther; 1995 Oct; 2(8):509-11. PubMed ID: 8593600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Profit and the patent on life. Attali J New Perspect Q; 1994; 11(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 15739292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Churches say no to gene patenting. Christ Century; 2000 Sep; 117(25):899-900. PubMed ID: 12528735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]