375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17687803)
1. A proposal for addressing the effects of hindsight and positive outcome biases in medical malpractice cases.
Haskel MA
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2007; 42(3):895-940. PubMed ID: 17687803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical malpractice: trends in litigation.
Floyd TK
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1822-5, 1825.e1. PubMed ID: 18482584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
Anderson RE
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The case for a Missouri stabilization fund.
Reintjes SL
Mo Med; 2005; 102(6):500-1. PubMed ID: 16355631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Harmonisation of personal injury compensation in the European Union. Application to medical liability case law].
Hureau J
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2006 Mar; 190(3):725-41; discussion 741-6. PubMed ID: 17140106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Debunking medical malpractice myths: unraveling the false premises behind "tort reform".
Boehm G
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 15742581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health care providers and facilities issue brief: medical malpractice and tort reform: year end report-2004.
McKinley A
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2004 Dec; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 15768469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hindsight bias and outcome bias in the social construction of medical negligence: a review.
Hugh TB; Dekker SW
J Law Med; 2009 May; 16(5):846-57. PubMed ID: 19554863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The forecast: blue skies for the Missouri JUA with winds from the west carrying the Stabilization Fund.
Gates LG
Mo Med; 2009; 106(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19397102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. More than just caps are needed to solve New Jersey's professional liability crisis.
Chang L
N J Med; 2004 May; 101(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 15185519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Society attacks med mal challenge on multiple levels.
Busalacchi S
WMJ; 2005 Sep; 104(7):11-2. PubMed ID: 16294591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
Dwyer CL
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Malpractice. Can no-fault work?
Weiss GG
Med Econ; 2004 Jun; 81(11):66-9, 71. PubMed ID: 15239646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In his December 25 column of Connecticut Post, William A. Collins once again provided his imaginative overview of the medical liability insurance crisis.
Thomas KA
Conn Med; 2006 Apr; 70(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 16768079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health courts.
Kopen DF
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Aug; 91(8):48. PubMed ID: 18557074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Malpractice reforms: are they fair?
Mehlman MJ
Clin Perinatol; 2005 Mar; 32(1):235-49, ix. PubMed ID: 15777831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of California's Medical Injury Compensation Review Act (MICRA).
Evans MB
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 15293664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical malpractice crisis: Florida's recent experience.
Cline RE; Pepine CJ
Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(24):2936-8. PubMed ID: 15210608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Health care on trial: America's medical malpractice crisis.
Kereiakes DJ; Willerson JT
Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(24):2939-41. PubMed ID: 15210609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
