191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17687838)
1. In vivo (rat assay) assessment of nutritional improvement of peas (Pisum sativum L.).
Nagra SA; Bhatty N
East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(3):646-53. PubMed ID: 17687838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nutritional improvement of Lobia (Phaseolus vulgaris) by supplementation with poultry, mutton and beef meat.
Bhatty N; Gilani AH; Nagra SA
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2001 Nov; 52(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 11570019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of cooking and supplementation with different kinds of meats on the nutritional value of mash (Vigna mungo).
Bhatty N; Gilani AH; Nagra SA
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2000 May; 51(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 10945112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nutritional value of mung bean (Vigna radiata) as effected by cooking and supplementation.
Bhatty N; Gilani AH; Nagra SA
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2000 Dec; 50(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 11464669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nutritional assessment in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (Pisum sativum L.).
Alonso R; Grant G; Dewey P; Marzo F
J Agric Food Chem; 2000 Jun; 48(6):2286-90. PubMed ID: 10888538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of peas for broiler chickens.
Hejdysz M; Kaczmarek SA; Rutkowski A
Arch Anim Nutr; 2016 Oct; 70(5):364-77. PubMed ID: 27434309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation in precaecal amino acid and energy digestibility between pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars determined using a linear regression approach.
Kluth H; Mantei M; Elwert C; Rodehutscord M
Br Poult Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 16050186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of feeding soybean meal and differently processed peas on intestinal morphology and functional glucose transport in the small intestine of broilers.
Röhe I; Boroojeni FG; Zentek J
Poult Sci; 2017 Sep; 96(11):4075-4084. PubMed ID: 29050410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nutritive values of corn, soybean meal, canola meal, and peas for broiler chickens as affected by a multicarbohydrase preparation of cell wall degrading enzymes.
Meng X; Slominski BA
Poult Sci; 2005 Aug; 84(8):1242-51. PubMed ID: 16156208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Processing on the in Vitro and in Vivo Protein Quality of Yellow and Green Split Peas (Pisum sativum).
Nosworthy MG; Franczyk AJ; Medina G; Neufeld J; Appah P; Utioh A; Frohlich P; House JD
J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Sep; 65(35):7790-7796. PubMed ID: 28796503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Composition and in vitro digestibility of raw versus cooked white- and colour-flowered peas.
Pastuszewska B; Vitjazkova M; Swiech E; Taciak M
Nahrung; 2004 Jun; 48(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15285116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protein quality of various raw and rendered by-product meals commonly incorporated into companion animal diets.
Cramer KR; Greenwood MW; Moritz JS; Beyer RS; Parsons CM
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3285-93. PubMed ID: 17609474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the feeding value of South Dakota-grown field peas (Pisum sativum l.) for growing pigs.
Stein HH; Benzoni G; Bohlke RA; Peters DN
J Anim Sci; 2004 Sep; 82(9):2568-78. PubMed ID: 15446472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The enhancement of the nutritive value of peas for broiler chickens: an evaluation of micronization and dehulling processes.
Igbasan FA; Guenter W
Poult Sci; 1996 Oct; 75(10):1243-52. PubMed ID: 8893301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability of amino acid digestibility of lupin and pea grains in caecectomised laying hens.
Zuber T; Siegert W; Salehi H; Hummel F; Rodehutscord M
Br Poult Sci; 2019 Jun; 60(3):229-240. PubMed ID: 30539645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro digestibility, protein composition and techno-functional properties of Saskatchewan grown yellow field peas (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by processing.
Ma Z; Boye JI; Hu X
Food Res Int; 2017 Feb; 92():64-78. PubMed ID: 28290299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the inclusion of cooked cereals and pea starch in diets based on soy or pea protein concentrate on nutrient digestibility and performance of young pigs.
Parera N; Lázaro RP; Serrano MP; Valencia DG; Mateos GG
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):671-9. PubMed ID: 19820052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between proportion and composition of albumins, and in vitro protein digestibility of raw and cooked pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.).
Park SJ; Kim TW; Baik BK
J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Aug; 90(10):1719-25. PubMed ID: 20564440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Growth performance and carcass and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets containing micronized-dehulled peas (Pisum sativum cv. Spirale) as a substitute of soybean meal.
Laudadio V; Tufarelli V
Poult Sci; 2010 Jul; 89(7):1537-43. PubMed ID: 20548084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of raw material source, ash content, and assay length on protein efficiency ratio and net protein ratio values for animal protein meals.
Johnson ML; Parsons CM
Poult Sci; 1997 Dec; 76(12):1722-7. PubMed ID: 9438288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
